I think he means "SATAM isn't purely for kids" not that it's not for kids full stop. That's what constantly annoys me, when people like me, myself included, get grief for liking things like SATAM or Sonic in general when they're within my age group (20s) or older because it's seen as kids stuff, far from it. Most of the "kiddy" things we still enjoy now, we still enjoy because they're designed to be enjoyed by all age groups, not just one and they are, I mean, look at the most common age group on this site alone!
Anyway, just thought I'd clear that up. I do, however, agree with the show having many flaws but I don't necessarily agree with the animation and artwork being two of them, they're actually some of the best I've seen from DiC (I won't say in general because it was a very typical look at the time) and much better than what most production teams slap together in a matter of weeks nowadays with the aid of computer software and CG.
- Prince ByTor likes this






Send me a message
Find content
Female
