brmsort

Getting stuff done? What did he accomplish in getting rid of Quadafi? Oh yah, set up al qaeda offshoots to take over, and let our embassy get overrun. He did the same in Egypt. The whole Arab Spring that he supported has done nothing except give terrorists more power throughout the region. Mission accomplished, Mr. Obama!

ISIS would be a dead duck if 1) we didn't leave Iraq with an infant military in a hostile region and 2) if we left Syria alone to crush them. But no, our President wants to get rid of Assad just like he did Quadafi in Libya, which will give yet another country to jihadists.

So he killed Bin Laden? Big deal! Any American would have made that call. It doesn't take a great leader to make that choice! The only heroes in that act were the ones that actually did the deed and got it done.

Oh and funny thing, now we conveniently find out after all the crap he caught for it, that Bush didn't lie and Iraq DID have banned chemical weapons. Chemical weapons that our current President knew or should have known were still in Iraq which is now overrun by ISIS.

Now was going into Iraq in the first place a good choice? Who knows. But the war is hardly the only cause of our soaring debt. And I find it ironic that the same people applauding the removal of Quadifi and Assad condemn the removal of Saddam. The only difference is that Iraq took years to fall into the hands of terrorists thanks to the ground presence we had there and the training we began to provide (in fact it is not quiet there yet), but it took months for Libya, and would for Syria if Assad were removed.

Either Pres. Obama has the worst luck in decision making ever, or he is the smartest man ever to commit a conspiracy before our eyes and get away with it.

Next chapter is up in full:

https://www.fanficti...dgehog-Season-3

I noticed the dearth of what I would call Saturday morning cartoons recently, but the local station used to still show at least some shows. Now, my wife tells me, even that has gone away.

Damn the Leviathan of the US Government and its constant war on liberty via executive fiat. Edutainment, with very few exceptions, SUCKS! It tries too hard to educate that it forgets to tell a damn story or do anything that will keep a kid's attention for over 10 minutes. And even the educational benefit is questionable -- after all, what the heck do they think kids are doing the rest of the week!? And I don't know about you, but I don't remember ever watching "teen" shows. By the time I got old enough to graduate from cartoons, I was watching whatever my parents did.

My ISP charges me an arm and a leg to use for than 50 GB/mo, I think. You know how quickly 50 GB evaporates when using Hulu or Netflix or any other video service? Insane!

NO! Little kids can't watch Looney Tunes or Sonic for free on the local airwaves; its dangerous! But let them learn how to use a dildo and condom before they even grow pubic hair! That is the mark of an enlightened society.

I am sure no pay-to-play media provider lobbies were involved in the crafting of this strategy at all!

Next thing you know they will ban private wells for drinking water. "Only water you buy from this government-licensed provider is safe for consumption. Just think of the kids! It's for the kids!"

Well, *obscene gesture* toward you, government that has nothing better to do than to watch naked photos of granny and feel up prepubescent girls at airports and look for ways to intrude into every little detail of my daily life (its not like there are psychos out there raping and eviscerating innocents by the thousands, or any flesh-liquifying epidemics out there), I am going to buy every uncensored Looney Tune, Tex Avery, and other Saturday morning and syndicated cartoon I can find and *gasp* watch it with my kids, and their kids, assuming by then parents even get to keep their own kids.

I really need to try this mod / hack. Super Sally?!?

I suspect, Neon, that is it both. They seem to be well armed and coordinated (and probably connected to many other such groups in those regions), but Islam is also a merits-based religion. And if you can convince people that believe in such a thing already that physical conquest and subjugation is meritorious, you can get a whole lot of people, especially the impoverished, to rally around your cause. It also doesn't hurt if you can blame some other group for the impoverishing of the region, even if it is completely bunk.

Of course, as a Christian, I also believe that these people, though willing to be such monsters themselves, are being used and deceived by other "powers" to commit these atrocities. So the fight is on two fronts. They need to be fought with all available force to stop their madness; they need to be converted in their souls and minds toward a better way, a truth. They are on the cusp of truth: they just worship the wrong prophet (I know they claim not to worship any man). One prophet was a conqueror, an executioner of his enemies; the other allowed others to falsely accuse Him and kill Him. One sought revenge; the Other sought restoration. Who we worship, who we adore, or who we want to be LIKE, does make a difference. We westerners like to think that religion and principles are just personal choices and beliefs that don't matter outside the walls of our places of worship, but such is not the case.