We've noticed that you've been inactive for over 10 minute(s). We've stopped running the Shoutbox due to your inactivity. If you are back again, please click the I'm Back button below.
As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.
Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.
No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!
I'm not trying to go against the established rules here, but I don't think I stand alone here when I say that some of us more experienced roleplayers would like to have the right to make a few additional rules in our topics to block out things like Godmodding and metagaming. This isn't a demand to change or add new standard rules here, but that if we don't want things like Mary-Sues, power-playing, etc. we should be allowed to reject those sorts of things at the beginning of our topics/stories so that people know what kind of RP it is and they're getting into beforehand.
Because there's been a lot of talk about this o other boards, especially within the last couple of weeks I thought I'd bring this up. Do you think she's a Mary-Sue? Many fans who don't like her (and even some who do) are accusing Ian of making plotholes, bending the story's logic and derailing characters/concepts that weren't broken to begin with for her favor. Do you agree with this? Why or why not, and if so, do you think there's anything that can be done to salvage the character? Explain your thoughts here.