RedAuthar

Meh. I kinda want the Iron Queen to bite the dust too. Never liked her much.

Actually Super Mario Bros had a fairly good script out before it was replaced with the Movie we have today. Somewhere along the line...somebody thought a Science Fiction Mario was better then Fantasy Mario.

Really? Do you happen to know if there's a link to where you can read the original script?

I'm curious to see what it would have been about before the stupid dinosaurs evolution crap.

I have a PDF copy myself I got from http://randomhoohaas...ovie/1/info.htm , but I can't seem to find it (haven't been there in a while).

Found it here: http://www.smbmovie....tion/script.htm
Brief summery provided by previous Link:

Original “Fantasy” Script

Writers: Jim Jennewein & Tom S. Parker

Revision Date: July 17th, 1991

Pages: 114

Overview:

Envisioned by writers Tom S. Parker and Jim Jennewein (The Flintstones, Richie Rich) as a comedic take on fairy tale themes in the same vein as The Princess Bride (and eventually the “Shrek” series), this gem of a screenplay gives us a glimpse of what the film would have been like if it were a more direct, cartoonish adaptation of the games.

The story follows brothers Mario and Luigi as they attempt to rescue Princess Hildy (that name makes you appreciate Daisy that much more, huh?) from the evil King Koopa in a wacky world reminiscent of The Wizard of Oz and Alice in Wonderland. This screenplay laid the groundwork for how the characters were used by later writers: Mario is the reluctant hero, while Luigi is the dreamer who gets the girl. Both must overcome deep-stemmed differences to become “brothers” for the first time.

This script and its writing team were let go following the departure of director Greg Beeman. Without another director willing to take over the project as it was, the producers were forced to go with the wildly different concept pitched by husband-and-wife directing team Rocky Morton and Annabel Jankel of Max Headroom fame.

Reed...I really have to ask...if you don't like the ponies so much why do you insist on following the thread?

I mean acstrife and I are mods and have to check in every once and a while. Why do you?

Nothing since the allegation of missing contracts (which makes Archie look really stupid, how do you do that). It's ongoing.

The claim that they are missing may make them look stupid, however it is safer then saying they don't have them.

....Being a forum mod it is my job to remind you guys and fix things like this thank you.

They should have to face robotized Cat (Kat?) sometime during their adventure.

I hope this means there is a two player function like Sonic 2 and Sonic 3

*Jaw to floor*
HOLY!

I vaguely remember people complaining it was too light hearted not too long ago....

There is no pleasing some fans.

How come in Sonic Rush Blaze gets her emeralds after every boss, but Sonic has to play a minigame to get his?

Thanks for this response. This is such an underrated part of having fun doing an activity. If everyone is trying to win, the process is more fun for everyone I believe. Therefore I simply sigh at people who say playing for fun and playing to win are mutually exclusive.

In any competition there are winners and losers. But winning is hollow if the competitors don't try to win. That takes away the fun from the winners. So by default, for everyone to have fun, you need to play by the rules to win.

In your defense, part of having fun is trying to win. To play the game right, you need to TRY TO WIN. However winning should not be the ultimate goal. Play to have fun, but try to win. If you lose, at least it was fun, if you win, great. Always try to do better the next time.

....Okay I got nothing on that one.

Now all of you suck it up, be men.

YOU BE A MAN, AND WATCH MY LITTLE PONY!





FRIENDSHIP IS MAGIC!

No offense, but honestly that's not the manliest comeback