Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

on*

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

Red said he couldnt get one

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?


nuckles87

Member Since 02 Sep 2010
Offline Last Active Jan 10 2011 09:54 PM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Ian Flynn; Revionist Asshole

03 January 2011 - 09:53 PM

QUOTE
Yes, I have read it.


Then you'd know that absolutely nothing happens in that story. Naugus escapes his zone prison for a bit, fights Sonic, then gets sent right back in. The story, as it is, suits Ian's "vision" just fine, because there is absolutely nothing in it that contradicts what he's written. In other words, if this is a remake, whatever changes made to the story won't be terribly profound, and more then likely simply done to make it a more interesting fight.

Furthermore, revising stories to suit a newer, often wildly different canon is nothing new to a long running series. Look at any long running comic book that's been under more then one creator and you'll see plotholes, stories that are taken into a completely different context by later stories, and entire swaths of a comic's continuity can often be made inert on the whim of a writer or editor. This has been done to all the major comics in the industry at one point or another, and they've been hailed as both the best and the worst stories ever written in comics. They did it without completely rebooting the series, because that would have thrown away ALL the work done by past creators instead of simply trimming the fat. It's a common practice in comics.

So...what's the big deal here again?

In Topic: Ian Flynn; Revionist Asshole

03 January 2011 - 03:48 PM

QUOTE (Maren @ Jan 2 2011, 01:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My issue with this has little to do with whether or not Ian gave Ken Penders credit. I don't care how bad the story or its art was, allowing him to blatantly rewrite issues to suit his (usually inconsistent) vision of things would only encourage the plotholes and character derailment he's already notorious of, and that's bad enough to deal with as it is.

If he wanted to 'revise' the series to suit his vision, he should have just rebooted the comic.


Alright, I have a question....have you actually read Naugus Games?