Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


Photo

A 3Rd Season Or A Reboot


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Poll: A 3rd Season or a Reboot

Would you prefer a third season of SatAM or a reboot?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 November 2014 - 12:20 AM

It took 30 years for someone to work up a prequel to John Carpenter's The Thing, but the wait was worth it. They took the time and effort to go over the intricate details of the scenes involving the ruins of Thull Station. They listened to the fans and managed to work in some of the more logical fan theories regarding some aspects of Thing abilities. They were respectful to the mythology of the origional and made a wonderful companion piece to it. So, don't give up on a Season 3 of SatAM. All it really needs is some people willing to do some hard work and who will respect what is loved about SatAM, and perhaps change a few things that aren't so loved, in a manner that's not going to break anything major.
An alternative idea that comes to mind is doing something akin to what they did with Voltron Force and the 2008 Knight Rider series: Make a new show, but make it a continuation of the continuity/mythology of the original. This is a good way to bypass the problems of a remake/reboot, while still somewhat pandering to that crowd. I really don't think that the idea of completely starting over is a good idea. You have to re-hash plots and screw around with what people liked, which treads on dangerous ground. If someone were to make a remake/reboot of SatAM, it wouldn't have the same tone, because they'd be pandering to today's kids. And that means a lot more crude humor and idiocy and generally awful writing and plots. I dare you to find an honest-to-God Dukes Of Hazzard fan who doesn't want to take the people who made the remake/reboot movie and gut-shoot them and let them bleed out out in the woods. That's what you're risking when you support a "reboot".



There's good reboots, and there are bad reboots. And sometimes, there are ones in between. It mostly depends on who is directing it and what direction they have in mind.

Regarding SatAM, as good/unique as it was, times have changed since its last airing and the series doesn't hold-up too well by today's standards. Since most fans are familiar with the games currently, it makes sense to reflect that depiction, but give it a different direction. Like keep the current designs and modern characters, but up the ante by adding more drama and character development. Heck, why not reintroduce the older characters so that younger/newer audiences can get to know them?

To put it simply: why hold your breath when you can inhale a new one? It's the same pair of lungs as before; but with fresher air pumping through them.

As far as a continuation goes, I'm perfectly fine with the Se3son series. As for a spiritual successor, the Archie comics seem to have that covered (especially now).

#22 Shadow

Shadow

    Fellow FUSer

  • Sonic Corner Moderator
  • 3,245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 21 November 2014 - 08:02 PM

It took 30 years for someone to work up a prequel to John Carpenter's The Thing, but the wait was worth it.

post-30826-Ed-Norton-laptop-close-gif-Hu


IxXnFrm.png


#23 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 22 November 2014 - 07:31 PM

There's good reboots, and there are bad reboots. And sometimes, there are ones in between. It mostly depends on who is directing it and what direction they have in mind.

Regarding SatAM, as good/unique as it was, times have changed since its last airing and the series doesn't hold-up too well by today's standards. Since most fans are familiar with the games currently, it makes sense to reflect that depiction, but give it a different direction. Like keep the current designs and modern characters, but up the ante by adding more drama and character development. Heck, why not reintroduce the older characters so that younger/newer audiences can get to know them?

To put it simply: why hold your breath when you can inhale a new one? It's the same pair of lungs as before; but with fresher air pumping through them.

As far as a continuation goes, I'm perfectly fine with the Se3son series. As for a spiritual successor, the Archie comics seem to have that covered (especially now).

 

First of all, let's stop calling a duck an eagle and ignore this rebranding of "remake" as "reboot"... It disgusts me that so many people have fallen for the ruse of "It's not a remake! It's a reboot!"... If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, reguardless of how many times the park ranger keeps telling you it's really a unique type of eagle...

 

And secondly, call me jaded, but I've seen too many of the things I grew up loving being remade into complete and utter crap to satisfy the modern audiences. It's the stuff that says "This is for the fans, and if you don't like it, that's just too bad" that turns out to be the good remakes. I'm not a fan of the direction modern society has taken. It's circling the drain. And reworking SatAM to cater to the modern equivilent of its origional audience's age range, you'll wind up with a shitty remake. No. You must be willing to go back to the proper style. Even if you rework the rest of the show, you NEED to keep in certain elements. If you lose what keeps bringing the older audience back, you're going to lose them. And that's really more important than catering to the newer generations. If you're going to lose those elements, you should just say "screw it" and make a completely differnent series with a different name and go pander to the modern kiddies, rather than insult the origional fans with a horrible remake.

 

 

It took 30 years for someone to work up a prequel to John Carpenter's The Thing, but the wait was worth it.

post-30826-Ed-Norton-laptop-close-gif-Hu

 

Reply format invalid. Please submit reply in a format readable by the person you're replying to.


Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#24 RedAuthar

RedAuthar

    The Spambot Killer.

  • Admins
  • 37,785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knothole

Posted 22 November 2014 - 09:56 PM

Remake generally gives off the feel of it is the same story being told again. Reboots usually give off the feel of cleaning off the slate and starting again.

Though yeah, they're pretty much the same thing.

#25 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 23 November 2014 - 04:37 PM

In other words, you've got a brown-headed duck and a green headed duck, and it really doesn't matter, because they're both ducks. People just like the green headed duck more because it looks a little fancier. But to a duck hunter, they all eat the same. :evo:


Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#26 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 29 November 2014 - 02:43 PM

SatAM would have to be switched up a bit if it were to be made today...Although I would prefer it not to be changed too much.   Add some *some* modern stuff into it just so you can draw in that new age..But not a over whelming amount. Just enough that you know its modern but keeping it classic at the same time.


Hard to explain but ..yeah..



#27 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 November 2014 - 03:01 PM

First of all, let's stop calling a duck an eagle and ignore this rebranding of "remake" as "reboot"...


Vlad, how many fucking times do I have to explain this to you?

Remake: Retelling a story. Something you do to an individual work.
Reboot: Starting a series over. Something you do to a continuity. Usually does not involve retelling an existing story.

We're not calling a duck an eagle. You're saying ducks and eagles are the same thing.

#28 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 29 November 2014 - 09:07 PM

SatAM would have to be switched up a bit if it were to be made today...Although I would prefer it not to be changed too much.   Add some *some* modern stuff into it just so you can draw in that new age..But not a over whelming amount. Just enough that you know its modern but keeping it classic at the same time.


Hard to explain but ..yeah..

I believe I understand what you're saying. Basically, allow a bit of retooling here and there, but don't go with a complete overhaul. Fix what's broken, but don't mess around with what isn't. Right?

 

I believe I could support a new SatAM, if the changes weren't severe enough to ruin what we like about the origional. If it were made primarily for the fans of the origional, but included some odds and ends that could bring in a new generation of fans.

 

 

First of all, let's stop calling a duck an eagle and ignore this rebranding of "remake" as "reboot"...


Vlad, how many fucking times do I have to explain this to you?

Remake: Retelling a story. Something you do to an individual work.
Reboot: Starting a series over. Something you do to a continuity. Usually does not involve retelling an existing story.

We're not calling a duck an eagle. You're saying ducks and eagles are the same thing.

 

No. You're calling the green-headed duck an eagle. There are only superficial differences between the terms. You might like to note that the term "reboot" is being used to phase-out the term "remake". The idea that "It's not a remake! It's a reboot!" is nothing more than a marketing ploy. It's just rebranding of the old term into one that doesn't yet have the stigma of the old one. No one used to use the term "reboot". It was always "remake". And now, there is practically no use of the term "remake". It's all "reboot" this and "reboot" that.


Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#29 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 November 2014 - 11:47 PM

Except I have not once in my entire life heard somebody use the term "reboot" to describe a remake. The only person confusing the two is you.

#30 RedAuthar

RedAuthar

    The Spambot Killer.

  • Admins
  • 37,785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knothole

Posted 29 November 2014 - 11:54 PM

Would the Hammer Mummy movies be a Reboot or a Remake...cuz they're usually I here them as remakes while the ones staring Brendan Fraiser is a reboot

#31 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 30 November 2014 - 05:20 PM

Would the Hammer Mummy movies be a Reboot or a Remake...cuz they're usually I here them as remakes while the ones staring Brendan Fraiser is a reboot

As with all matters of semantics, it only really matters to nit-pickers. Perhaps we should get back on topic before we get into more circular arguements?


Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users