Plus, you need to think of this: a lot of us know that a mere step in the direction of infringing on what are our constitutional right will set a precedent that lets even further legislation and further restrictions get their foot in the door. It may start out as higher restrictions on handguns, but once the precedent is set, there's no reversing it and it allows those who think we shouldn't have guns at all begin to set their foot in. What can start as an absolute sincere humanitarian ideal could end up having one of our constitutional rights taken away. It can happen and all it takes is a step in that direction to keep the ball rolling. That's why so many oppose it, because there shouldn't be a fear that our rights will be taken away.
I distinctly remember a Rudeguy bragging on FUS about how he got away with killing a robber and get to sue the bereaved family for collateral damages.














