Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

on*

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

Red said he couldnt get one

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?


Photo

Archie Sonic: Satam Redesigns


  • Please log in to reply
179 replies to this topic

#101 Prince ByTor

Prince ByTor

    SatAM and Sally Acorn Fan

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 452 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tobes of Hades

Posted 28 August 2013 - 10:24 AM

 

I wanna give it a chance but the classic side of me doesnt like it. I mean they had the same look for the past 20+ years and now they decide its time to change it. i understand they wanna keep it similar to the Games but look at Sally from the picture that was posted, it took me a moment to realize who it was.

 

It's her eyes; the shape and quality are too different.



#102 MoKat

MoKat

    Gun-toting Black Mage ^.^

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 504 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Kentucky

Posted 28 August 2013 - 11:59 AM

Antoine: Is it just me or is anyone else getting some Other M vibes here? :lol:

 

Heh, it isn't just -you-, Mike...


Naoto-nuke-bnr-100ph_zpsov2gomma.png


#103 Mike Arcade

Mike Arcade

    Running Wild

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in California

Posted 28 August 2013 - 05:19 PM

 

Antoine: Is it just me or is anyone else getting some Other M vibes here? :lol:

 

Heh, it isn't just -you-, Mike...

 

Well I'm not complaining, Other M's story was awesome! I wished that the comic had a consistent art style and that Ian would have told us what would have happened had the comic continued, but what we got at that time was really good. Hell Ian makes a few nods to it such as The Suppression Squad's new outfits (lifted from the Prelate Chaotix) and most obviously the Dark Future Freedom Fighters.


Seriously, HOW THE HELL did nobody know that Robotnik was evil!? I mean just look at those red, glowing, hellish eyes, oh yeah I can completely trust that guy with my life! *sarcasm*

#104 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 28 August 2013 - 07:03 PM

Hey no problem man, I really do get it myself but while I do love the SatAM and like the Archie Comic a lot, I didn't really collect or watch every issue and show, I didn't even see SatAM until it was online and even then I started to really watch it when I got the Shout DVD Collection. I'm just really chill when it comes to stuff like this, dunno why but that's just me.

 

But as i said, they should of done it years ago instead of now


Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#105 Mike Arcade

Mike Arcade

    Running Wild

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in California

Posted 28 August 2013 - 08:45 PM

 

Hey no problem man, I really do get it myself but while I do love the SatAM and like the Archie Comic a lot, I didn't really collect or watch every issue and show, I didn't even see SatAM until it was online and even then I started to really watch it when I got the Shout DVD Collection. I'm just really chill when it comes to stuff like this, dunno why but that's just me.

 

But as i said, they should of done it years ago instead of now

 

 

Okay then, what year and what team in the Archie Comics would you have do the redesigns? I don't really know how Ian could have worked in redesigns when he and his team started back in 2006 or 2007, as Archie pretty much told them to clean up the mess the Penders/Bollers run had left behind, and if we are talking about before Ian's run then I'm guessing a redesign during or before the Sonic Adventure adaption would be the case or anytime after that during the Penders/Bollers run. However I ask you this, would you REALLY want Penders  and/or Bollers to redesign the characters? While I do like Penders earlier stuff (though it has not held up too well due to it being overly complex) the thought that either of those guys doing redesigns for everyone else is a scary though...


Seriously, HOW THE HELL did nobody know that Robotnik was evil!? I mean just look at those red, glowing, hellish eyes, oh yeah I can completely trust that guy with my life! *sarcasm*

#106 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 28 August 2013 - 08:49 PM

Point taken, though i think its the artists who come up with the redesigns. If it were to happen sooner i think when Flynn just started out. and it didnt have to be spontainous like its going to be, hell if it was gradual i wouldnt have that much of a problem with it (i still would have a problem with it) They just make it seem forced if anything, like bam they are redesigned, deal with it


Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#107 Mike Arcade

Mike Arcade

    Running Wild

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in California

Posted 28 August 2013 - 10:00 PM

Point taken, though i think its the artists who come up with the redesigns. If it were to happen sooner i think when Flynn just started out. and it didnt have to be spontainous like its going to be, hell if it was gradual i wouldnt have that much of a problem with it (i still would have a problem with it) They just make it seem forced if anything, like bam they are redesigned, deal with it

 

To be fair, Ian DID have to prove himself to Archie in order to get a good amount of control, after all that clean up he did Ian got to do the stuff he wanted to, but when all that stuff happened was where things got messed up. If anything Ian and the writers got screwed over as much as we did. It's only now that they can make things better again, truth be told previous writers (such as Penders, Ironically enough) got screwed over and couldn't do some stuff they wanted to due to stuff being rejected and indefinitely on hold due to mandates from both Archie and Sega. I would call this Ian and Co.'s TRUE test for this comic as much like the writers and teams before them, they have to deal with the same to similar things the previous ones had to endure. Only in this case, one of the causes for this is a former writer of the comic itself. Nobody said Irony wasn't a bitch.

 

I DO like what I've seen though, as the soft reset ITSELF can be a story arc with more and more characters remembering the old, "colorful" world gradually as the comic continues from now on. The crazy things that can come of it, the identity crisis characters could have, as many a villain in stories have said...THINK OF THE POSSIBLITES!!! And if a few have to be sacrificed to make the world a better place, SO BE IT!!!!!! *Insane Laughter*

 

Hehe, sorry about that, went a little nuts there. But seriously I do hope those old characters come back, and at the same time I am ready to see what this soft reset world will bring.
 


Seriously, HOW THE HELL did nobody know that Robotnik was evil!? I mean just look at those red, glowing, hellish eyes, oh yeah I can completely trust that guy with my life! *sarcasm*

#108 bwrosas

bwrosas

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 398 posts

Posted 29 August 2013 - 01:07 AM

 
 
11:05 AM, Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
 
Within the past 24 to 48 hours, many fans on this message board and others have received issue 252 and within the past week almost have read and looked at the six page preview, many ask the question, and that question is : ''What was the point of the past two years of this story arc?"
 
Now that is a very good question.  Many feel that there was no point whatsoever for Ian Flynn to write this story arc and place established characters into situations that as of 252 and the upcoming Countdown To Chaos will have no resolve whatsoever.  In other words have no absolute conclusion.  Why would fans feel this way?, Mainly because Ian Flynn with all due respect in my opinion wrote himself into a corner.
 
Now I'm not saying that to be bias, I'm saying that because from what has gone on behind the scenes, it seems that it is the most logical answer.  You see, Ian Flynn had to alter/change his original plans of the story arc because of what happened behind the scenes.  And to me with all due respect, I feel even though Ian had planned this story arc out from beginning to end, that he did not have a plan set in place in case something happened that would be beyond his control.  Because it seems that a lot of the edits and changes that were made to the issues in the story arc were done almost at the last minute/11th hour, in other words almost right to the last second of the deadline that the story was required to be ready for publication because of what happened behind the scenes.
 
Longtime fans and new fans can blame the lawsuit for these sudden changes and alteration of plans in the story arc.  Some can blame the interference of Sega and Capcom was sticking their nose in at the wrong time in ordering the crossover to take place during the planned schedule time that Ian was hoping to wrap up his current story arc.  And again some fans can blame Ian Flynn himself.  Once again though, with all due respect to Ian Flynn, I believe as a longtime fan myself, someone who is read the comic from the very beginning and started to officially subscribed to it since issue 72 which should be about 180 issues ago this month, I believe that he had everything set and ready to go as planned, but the downfall was the fact that he didn't plan out a backup plan in case anything would happen behind the scenes.  Thus the reason why some fans are confused and if not more upset at the fact that Ian Flynn took them on a two-year ride with no final destination insight.   
 
However in reality, a change of plans is not uncommon.  A couple of weeks ago, my second older sister and her husband were supposed to fly out of Las Vegas and come here to pick up the sons on the 18th of this month, but because mother nature decided to rain down on their plans, they had to wait an extra day and then fly out finally and get their kids.  Another example would be myself during that same situation, for you see I had planned to wake my nine-year-old nephew up to get him ready for school when his dad's father would pick him up and take him there, and while he would be gone, I would relax, do some vids for my YouTube channel, and possibly watch some movies as well as see what was going on on the Internet.  But because of the fact that my second older sister and her husband had to wait an extra day, their sons were here and thus that had altered my plans.  So again a change of plans is not uncommon in life.  One more example would be the fact, that my oldest sister was going to take my now 21-year-old niece to see American storm in Las Vegas, but because of the fact that they were on tour, a change of plans and destination had to be made, thus they decided to do the traditional Chippendale's instead.  And once again this shows that even though we plan out something and hope to achieve it and see it happen as we plan it out, sometimes plans will be altered and changed and if a destination is in mind within those plans, that it too can be altered and changed.  And that is exactly what happened with Ian Flynn's story arc.
 
Now one could argue, that even if that is the case, why was there no conclusion?  Because Ian's orginal plans for the story arc were altered and changed because he did not have a backup plan just in case certain things happened behind the scenes that would be beyond his control.
 
But I will say this, Ian and Paul do owe a straight forward, truthful explanation as to what the point was to the story arc of the past 2 1/2 years.  I will say that they do owe the entire fan base, the readers/subscribers an explanation.
 
And that is my take on this whole situation that's been talked about for the past week and more recently for the past 24 to 48 hours.
 
11:35 AM, Wednesday, August 28, 2013


#109 Prince ByTor

Prince ByTor

    SatAM and Sally Acorn Fan

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 452 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tobes of Hades

Posted 29 August 2013 - 06:09 PM

Hey, check this out: Link.

 

It's from E-122-Psi's Deviantart page.



#110 TheRedStranger

TheRedStranger

    The Soothsayer of Aeons.

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 1,447 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lurking in The Forbidden Zone

Posted 29 August 2013 - 06:44 PM

I honestly thank God I am not in Ian's postion...

 

 As fans we might not be able to profit from our fan-story's and art but we can express our love for the frachise any way we want without executive meddeling. One wrench in the gear can ruin everything.  SEGA should keep it's mouth shut and trust the writers a bit more and give them more slack to do intresting things with the characters.  

 

 I actually wish they'd break off and do another comic that can shake up the continuity and deviate in other complex and dramatic directions. It could be as different as The Brave and The Bold and Batman The Animated Series from the 90's. Same characters nut different conclusions, and different tone.



#111 Prince ByTor

Prince ByTor

    SatAM and Sally Acorn Fan

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 452 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tobes of Hades

Posted 29 August 2013 - 07:55 PM

I honestly thank God I am not in Ian's postion...

 

 As fans we might not be able to profit from our fan-story's and art but we can express our love for the frachise any way we want without executive meddeling. One wrench in the gear can ruin everything.  SEGA should keep it's mouth shut and trust the writers a bit more and give them more slack to do intresting things with the characters.  

 

 I actually wish they'd break off and do another comic that can shake up the continuity and deviate in other complex and dramatic directions. It could be as different as The Brave and The Bold and Batman The Animated Series from the 90's. Same characters nut different conclusions, and different tone.

 

Agreed, in my opinion Ian Flynn doesn't get enough credit; I would love to know what Sega and Archie have mandated.

I guess you're right; in the end these characters belong to us fans, not any of these companies. Heck, take a look at this site; there's a good chance that they'll be making an animated third season of the show; WITHOUT SEGA'S CONSENT OR HELP!

We are die-hard fans and have grown tired of playing Sega's little game; besides that WE can make our stories WITHOUT SEGA'S FAT NOSE getting in the way mandating what we can and can't do with our stories; including Sea3on!

 

I love these characters and the SatAM story; without them I wouldn't be a fan who buys their merchandise and plays their games. Even after all of this re-design crap when I think of Sally's, Bunny's, Antoine's, Rotor's, and everyone else from the series' designs I will think of the SatAM ones done by Ken Kinoshita:

10270-promo_cel-reconstruction-by-tobibr



#112 TheRedStranger

TheRedStranger

    The Soothsayer of Aeons.

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 1,447 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lurking in The Forbidden Zone

Posted 29 August 2013 - 09:18 PM

Geez, Robotnik is some much more menacing than Eggman.  :robotnik:



#113 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 12:48 AM

Geez, Robotnik is some much more menacing than Eggman.  :robotnik:

 

Oh really?

 

046eggman.jpg

 

Honestly, while I found the SatAM Robotnik menacing (mostly due to Jim Cumming's bone-chilling performance), I don't think he was nearly as interesting as Eggman. Where Julian was just scary, Eggman had a lot more to his character. He was goofy and silly at times, but can still be a serious threat (sorta like the Joker in "Batman:TAS"). His depiction in both SA1 and SA2 were good examples of this.

 

It wasn't until "Sonic X" that the friendlier, "don't kill" depiction of Eggman appeared. Ever since then, Eggman has had an even goofier, kid-friendly depiction. There are still times where he poses a big threat to the world, like during the opening of "Unleashed" and mind-controlling Tails in "Colors", but they don't last that long.

 

Despite that, I still think the most terrifying depiction of Robotnik/Eggman was in Fleetway's "Sonic the Comic".

 

Robotnik_(STC71).jpg

 

Yeesh!  :weird:



#114 bwrosas

bwrosas

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 398 posts

Posted 30 August 2013 - 02:33 PM

 
 
 
 
Friday, August 30, 2013.  Start time : 2:51 PM
 
 
 
The other day I talked about the fact that fans were asking the question of what was the point of the past 2 1/2 years of story.   Well, another question that has arisen over the past week or so, is "What was the point of robotizing Sally and modifying and weaponzing her if there wasn't going to be a payoff."
 
Believe it or not, those that actually supported Ian's decision to turn Sally into a robot and modifier her, are actually now asking the question of what was the point if we're not going to get a proper payoff.  And that along with the other question are good questions to ask and that need to be answered.
 
Fans who had been against what Ian did to Sally, will come out and say that the reason we will not have a proper conclusion is due to the fact that what they had said over the past two years if not year and a half is true.   You see, a strong majority of fans had accused Ian Flynn of having Eggman gut Sally from the inside out.  In other words, fans accused Ian of having Eggman take Sally apart internally and rebuild her as nothing more than a battle ready Mecha robot.  Thus, the reasoning for what we saw at the New York comic con in October of last year and more recently what we had seen on the final page of issue 252.  In other words, what they see instead as a proper conclusion and a possible restoration of Sally back to flesh and blood, instead what they see is a copout or in other words a DEM.
 
There is no doubt, that the other majority of fans will counter this and say give it a chance, that we may still get an explanation.  But even these fans will admit and asked the question of what was the point of her being turned into a robot for the past two years.
 
Some fans will point out,  that issue after issue after issue, it was the same old pattern repeated over and over and over again.  That being, fight Sally, almost rescue Sally, then let Sally escape, rinse and repeat.  Which they will point out and say, that it was an unnecessary ride that Ian took us on with no final destination insight, thus the reason for the copout, instead of a proper conclusion.
 
I for one, will sit and wait, I will read the issues starting with 252 and going forward, because I, a longtime fan for the past 20 years, I'm hoping we get a proper explanation as to why now Sally is back to normal, new redesign and all.
 
I'm not afraid to admit, that I didn't like what he did to Sally, but for the past two years I dealt with it in my own way, true I still subscribed to the comic, but during the whole time she was a robot, I never opened a single issue.  But now I will.  I will open those issues, I will take a picture and video, so that you guys can see it for yourselves.  But again, I'm not afraid to admit that I didn't like what he did, because one, through the summaries and scans that were posted at several of the Sonic message boards, including this one, I just cannot picture Sally saying the things that she said when she was a robot to her friends.  True, story wise, she was not in control of her own actions, but still I could not bear myself to see her say those kind of things.  And that's coming from a longtime 20 year fan of the comic and yes even the Saturday morning show.  
 
But still, several fans will ask, "What was the point of this whole story arc of her being a robot, if there is not going to be a proper payoff?"
 
As I said before, if Ian Flynn does owe the fan base anything, it is a proper straightforward explanation as to what the point, if any, there was behind turning Sally into a battle ready robot.
 
 
Friday, August 30, 2013, finished time : 3:15 PM


#115 Mike Arcade

Mike Arcade

    Running Wild

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in California

Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:16 PM

 

Geez, Robotnik is some much more menacing than Eggman.  :robotnik:

 

Oh really?

 

*Sonic X Eggman*

 

Honestly, while I found the SatAM Robotnik menacing (mostly due to Jim Cumming's bone-chilling performance), I don't think he was nearly as interesting as Eggman. Where Julian was just scary, Eggman had a lot more to his character. He was goofy and silly at times, but can still be a serious threat (sorta like the Joker in "Batman:TAS"). His depiction in both SA1 and SA2 were good examples of this.

 

It wasn't until "Sonic X" that the friendlier, "don't kill" depiction of Eggman appeared. Ever since then, Eggman has had an even goofier, kid-friendly depiction. There are still times where he poses a big threat to the world, like during the opening of "Unleashed" and mind-controlling Tails in "Colors", but they don't last that long.

 

Despite that, I still think the most terrifying depiction of Robotnik/Eggman was in Fleetway's "Sonic the Comic".

 

*Fleetway Robotnik*

 

Yeesh!  :weird:

 

 

Speaking of Eggman being intimidating, check this out...

 

Th_DrIvoRobotnik-1-2-.jpg

 
...you were saying? :velvet:

Logi how could you forget putting that picture up?
 


Seriously, HOW THE HELL did nobody know that Robotnik was evil!? I mean just look at those red, glowing, hellish eyes, oh yeah I can completely trust that guy with my life! *sarcasm*

#116 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 08:00 PM

Logi how could you forget putting that picture up?

 

I must've forgotten it. 

 

Shame too because that's a scary moment as well.



#117 TheRedStranger

TheRedStranger

    The Soothsayer of Aeons.

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 1,447 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lurking in The Forbidden Zone

Posted 30 August 2013 - 09:19 PM

 

Logi how could you forget putting that picture up?

 

I must've forgotten it. 

 

Shame too because that's a scary moment as well.

 

 

 Oh this was not the Eggman I'm refering to. I am refering to "Baldy Mcnosehair" (the game Eggman).

 

 I see this guy, and I think "Beware Robotniks in Eggman clothing."



#118 jtreese

jtreese

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Island

Posted 12 September 2013 - 08:10 PM

If you guys thought the variant is bad, just look at the prototype cover for that same variant.

 

 

SEP130904.jpg

 

:weird:



#119 Prime

Prime

    Shuffle up the Wildcards! And deal 'em!

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 497 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 September 2013 - 03:25 AM

If you guys thought the variant is bad, just look at the prototype cover for that same variant.

 

 

SEP130904.jpg

 

:weird:

 

It's exactly the same except the fact it's brighter, Sonic's hand is open instead of balled up into a fist and the random "VARIANT" text across Nicole.

 

Can't say it's better or worse then the other version because it's 95% the same bag of shit as it always has been.

 

And prototype is the wrong word to use for this.


'Star Wars' is my story, just like my house is my house. So if I wanna paint my house green, even if everyone else thinks it should be red, guess what? I'm gonna paint it Jar Jar! - George Lucas

"The Devil Inside is the new scam from director William Something Something. The movie stars actors and was edited on a computer. Somewhere. This movie is the latest film in a series of very low budget films designed to look like real movies! And be released in theaters to make a quick buck via a horribly off kilter budget to profit ratio that the general public seem to be stupidly unaware of! These films use to be called 'direct to video' but now they are called 'first run features'. These films then vanish from the theaters, like a rapist leaving the scene of a crime." - Mike Stoklasa of RedLetterMedia

#120 Janus

Janus

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 195 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2013 - 06:33 PM

I'm still not too keen on the redesigns of Antoine and Sally.  But it is preferable to having them not appear at all.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users