Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (25 July 2015 - 03:35 AM)

When was that? Depending on when it was, it might have been a DNS issue. Those should be gone now.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

on*

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

Red said he couldnt get one

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself


Photo

Max Is At It Again.

Mysteriousanimatorx Matt Sullivan hoax

  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#81 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 10:16 AM

The darker plot is what most people liked SatAM in the first place. A bit darker it could of been better.

The only think i dont like is the Freedom Fighter Army, i still like the rag-tag team group that it was at the end of Season 2 with the KFF, WP, and others
Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#82 Captain Sorzo

Captain Sorzo

    The Captain

  • Scribes of Mobius
  • 390 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Richardson, Texas

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:24 AM

Making the show darker would have to be treated very delicately. For the most part, SatAM had a fantastic tonal balance, remaining ever optimistic despite the bleak, twisted setting and tragic circumstances that the protagonists were forced to contend with. It's certainly possible for a substantially darker take on the series to work, and indeed I prefer it that way, but I consider it absolutely paramount that the optimistic core be preserved.

Sea3on is a great example of a well done darker direction. The heroes are portrayed as far more emotionally fragile and vulnerable, making the strength they draw from their loved ones and ultimately themselves all the more important. It grants a deeper look at the characters and their struggles and relationships, yet remains ever hopeful. Rather than being its own end, action in the comic is frequently used to set up and direct these dynamics, as when Naugus partially freezes Tails in Chapter 2. The inherent act of a villain nearly killing a child is dark, yes, but the later scene in which Sonic attempts to comfort Tails, only for both to remain haunted by the latter's mortality, is far more meaningful.

Action for action's sake can be entertaining, but it often isn't very interesting upon examination, especially when the action is "dark." Lighthearted action can be used to provide a sense of fun and adventure, a key component of SatAM's tonal balance. Darker action lacks this advantage, and if it also lacks sufficient purpose, such as setting up plot points or character dynamics, illustrating themes, or creating appropriate levels of tension, it runs the risk of being boring and, if graphic, needlessly unpleasant. The majority of the action in the latest Archie Sonic arc falls victim to this. It is wholly superficial and pointless, yet robbed of the chance to at least be fun by the dark plot. It thus becomes boring and tedious very, very quickly, feeling like a cheap substitute for meaningful storytelling.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users