It was right after the article at the beginning of this thread.
The one that takes a post which says "don't worry and panic needlessly" and used it to spin a story so people would panic and act like things had been confirmed when they weren't. It was a question they knew couldn't be answered, and if it could, not by him. Pointing at that exchange and saying "Ian's a jerk for making TSSZ into a bad guy!" is only possible if you are entirely, 100% willing to distort anything so that your one-sided 'opponent' looks bad.
Well then, why don't you show us a link of the actual conversation if you think Ian was treated harshly here?
If TSSZ provoked him, I want to see evidence of it.
Even if for the record they did, Ian's supposed to be acting like a professional here. He's the head writer of a big comic book company.














