Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


Photo

A Fan's Take On What Could Have Been?


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#1 bwrosas

bwrosas

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 398 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:32 PM

Spoiler


#2 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 January 2013 - 07:12 PM

Huh, not bad.

The only thing that I didn't agree with was the use of Dark Sonic from "Sonic X" during the Angel Island bit. Ian has stated several times before that he can't use the character. Why not just make it Super Sonic? He's just as powerful and effective; he doesn't have to go all dark and edgy.

#3 RedAuthar

RedAuthar

    The Spambot Killer.

  • Admins
  • 37,785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knothole

Posted 22 January 2013 - 07:13 PM

Technically Dark Sonic doesn't belong to Archie....they'd have to get permission from the owners of Sonic X to use him.

#4 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:44 PM

i have a feeling he's spot on too
Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#5 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:50 PM

Huh, not bad. I mean, Vorahk295 can be a real douche at times, but this idea is something I wouldn't mind.


Wow, that's pretty harsh of you to say. You ever talk to the guy? He's actually a pretty nice person who does his homework about Sonic.

Sure, he's very hard on Flynn, but the points he makes are mostly valid whenever he critiques his work.

The only thing that I didn't agree with was the use of Dark Sonic from "Sonic X" during the Angel Island bit. Ian has stated several times before that he can't use the character.


I really don't get why Dark Sonic cannot be used. I mean, the more I look at this character, the more I realize he's got alot of story potential.
Posted Image

#6 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:16 PM

Huh, not bad. I mean, Vorahk295 can be a real douche at times, but this idea is something I wouldn't mind.


Wow, that's pretty harsh of you to say. You ever talk to the guy? He's actually a pretty nice person who does his homework about Sonic.

Sure, he's very hard on Flynn, but the points he makes are mostly valid whenever he critiques his work.


Some of the stuff i see i can agree with Laser
Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#7 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:49 PM

Wow, that's pretty harsh of you to say. You ever talk to the guy? He's actually a pretty nice person who does his homework about Sonic.

Sure, he's very hard on Flynn, but the points he makes are mostly valid whenever he critiques his work.


Okay, I was a bit harsh there. But that was my impression from reading his comments posted on DeviantArt and such. It's like he's hellbent on criticizing people simply for the sake of it. I'm sure he means well by trying to make his points clear, but I wish he would lay off the unnecessary bashing.

#8 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:22 PM

Okay, I was a bit harsh there. But that was my impression from reading his comments posted on DeviantArt and such. It's like he's hellbent on criticizing people simply for the sake of it. I'm sure he means well by trying to make his points clear, but I wish he would lay off the unnecessary bashing.


Well, he is a big fan of Linkara, so I'm not surprised at all his style has rubbed off on him.

Also, what critiquing do you think is unnecessary exactly?
Posted Image

#9 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 January 2013 - 01:24 AM

Well, he is a big fan of Linkara, so I'm not surprised at all his style has rubbed off on him.

Also, what critiquing do you think is unnecessary exactly?


Maybe it's just me, but it really annoys me when people spend most of their time ranting only on the negative aspects. When I critique something, I like to include the stuff which I thought worked. I don't solely focus on the negatives. But even than, I don't bother trying to be harsh towards something I don't like- unless its insulting or offensive. I prefer to acknowledge the positives, as well as suggest better alternatives/ideas for the negatives. That way, you'll recognize these problems in the future and be able to avoid making similar mistakes.

I also hate it when people make things a bigger deal than what they usually are. What isn't that bad at first suddenly becomes a big issue with others. A good example would be the "green eyes" scandal with "Sonic 4". Like the old saying goes: "You're making a mountain out of a molehill."

Normally, I don't get upset over small details. What I do hate, though, are problems that were deliberately done on purpose. I won't deny that Ian's story arc hasn't been that great so far, but it's really not as bad as most people are making it seem. Most of the story's problems weren't done on purpose; they're the direct results of overstrict mandates, a choppy editorial, and a scandal over copyrighted characters. I've seen worser things happen in the comic before (Sonic Live, Image Crossover, "the slap", ect.). And all those were deliberate.

#10 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 23 January 2013 - 03:24 PM

Maybe it's just me, but it really annoys me when people spend most of their time ranting only on the negative aspects. When I critique something, I like to include the stuff which I thought worked. I don't solely focus on the negatives. But even than, I don't bother trying to be harsh towards something I don't like- unless its insulting or offensive. I prefer to acknowledge the positives, as well as suggest better alternatives/ideas for the negatives. That way, you'll recognize these problems in the future and be able to avoid making similar mistakes.


Well, he does make suggestions on how it could be better. Not every rant is about the negative aspect of the story.

I also hate it when people make things a bigger deal than what they usually are. What isn't that bad at first suddenly becomes a big issue with others. A good example would be the "green eyes" scandal with "Sonic 4". Like the old saying goes: "You're making a mountain out of a molehill."


Well, I think comparing this to Sonic's green eyes is apples and oranges.

Green eyes is just a minor detail. Story plots done a certain way when it didn't have to be is not.

Normally, I don't get upset over small details. What I do hate, though, are problems that were deliberately done on purpose. I won't deny that Ian's story arc hasn't been that great so far, but it's really not as bad as most people are making it seem. Most of the story's problems weren't done on purpose; they're the direct results of overstrict mandates, a choppy editorial, and a scandal over copyrighted characters. I've seen worser things happen in the comic before (Sonic Live, Image Crossover, "the slap", ect.). And all those were deliberate.


Ok, fair point. There have been issues with deliberate garbage in it.

But, I really think saying these rants making a big deal out of small details is not a fair evaluation. We're not complaining about small things like how a character is drawn or even how much spotlight they get.

This is about characters we love getting the shaft, portrayed as stupid, incompetent and cold, adding unnecessary shockvalue and having dramatic moments that go nowhere.

Nicole's exile for example. What was the point of that? Nothing good came from it. No intriguing plot points, character development, nothing... it was mostly, "Oh, you're gone. and then it's "Ok, you can come back now."

Even how she came back was utterly ludicrous. She's brought back on the advice of a new Council member that starts that exact same day? How stupid does Ian think we are?

I'm sorry if I appear to be ranting to be here, but Nicole was treated so wrong, and then Ian couldn't even make something happen from it to make it worth our time to see.
Posted Image

#11 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:53 PM

Well, he does make suggestions on how it could be better. Not every rant is about the negative aspect of the story.


It sure seemed negative whenever I read his comments. This take at the story arc is the first sign of a positive suggestion I've read from him.

Well, I think comparing this to Sonic's green eyes is apples and oranges.

Green eyes is just a minor detail. Story plots done a certain way when it didn't have to be is not.


From what I've read so far, the story hasn't harmed the series in any serious way. The only real casualties so far have been Penders' characters being removed for the time being. But there's still a chance that they'll survive and make a comeback. We'll just have to wait and see.

Sure, Sally was roboticized and Antoine was badly injured; but none of them were permanently killed off. In fact, from what I've heard, Bunnie's gonna make an appearance in the latest "Sonic Universe" story arc. Also, Rotor is still about and more powerful than ever with his nanite battlesuit, so there's no need to worry about the SatAM cast being dropped from the series.

And with Sally's new design recently announced, we know for sure that she's gonna be un-roboticized sometime soon.

Ok, fair point. There have been issues with deliberate garbage in it.

But, I really think saying these rants making a big deal out of small details is not a fair evaluation. We're not complaining about small things like how a character is drawn or even how much spotlight they get.

This is about characters we love getting the shaft, portrayed as stupid, incompetent and cold, adding unnecessary shockvalue and having dramatic moments that go nowhere.

Nicole's exile for example. What was the point of that? Nothing good came from it. No intriguing plot points, character development, nothing... it was mostly, "Oh, you're gone. and then it's "Ok, you can come back now."

Even how she came back was utterly ludicrous. She's brought back on the advice of a new Council member that starts that exact same day? How stupid does Ian think we are?

I'm sorry if I appear to be ranting to be here, but Nicole was treated so wrong, and then Ian couldn't even make something happen from it to make it worth our time to see.


Like I said, the story isn't perfect. In fact, my biggest problem with it were the repetitive fights across Mobius with Mecha Sally, who still hasn't done anything yet (though that may change). But this problem originated due to the editors wanting Ian to span the story across several issues. From what I've read, the story was originally much shorter than what was originally written.

#12 PuffinGrandeur

PuffinGrandeur

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 472 posts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:36 PM

Any idea that uses Dark Sonic is immediately dumb. No takebacks.

#13 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:57 PM

It sure seemed negative whenever I read his comments. This take at the story arc is the first sign of a positive suggestion I've read from him.


Well, ok, he doesn't do that with every single rant, but he has at times talked about what should have happened instead of what DID HAPPEN


From what I've read so far, the story hasn't harmed the series in any serious way. The only real casualties so far have been Penders' characters being removed for the time being. But there's still a chance that they'll survive and make a comeback. We'll just have to wait and see.

Sure, Sally was roboticized and Antoine was badly injured; but none of them were permanently killed off. In fact, from what I've heard, Bunnie's gonna make an appearance in the latest "Sonic Universe" story arc. Also, Rotor is still about and more powerful than ever with his nanite battlesuit, so there's no need to worry about the SatAM cast being dropped from the series.

And with Sally's new design recently announced, we know for sure that she's gonna be un-roboticized sometime soon.


I have a strong suspicion they'll all be back, but heavily Segafied, just like what we saw with Sally's new design.

Ugh, I so hate that look.



Like I said, the story isn't perfect. In fact, my biggest problem with it were the repetitive fights across Mobius with Mecha Sally, who still hasn't done anything yet (though that may change). But this problem originated due to the editors wanting Ian to span the story across several issues. From what I've read, the story was originally much shorter than what was originally written.


Where did you hear Paul told Ian to expand his story?


Any idea that uses Dark Sonic is immediately dumb. No takebacks.


I don't think so at all. For a one off plot, it could be a really epic story.

In fact, I'd love to see a climax where Eggman pushed Sonic's buttons so much he became that form in a rage and went absolutely berserk on him and his machines, maybe even to the point his friends had to stop Sonic due to losing all self control over his emotional state.

How I long to see another story where Sonic wants to cut Robotnik into pieces like he did in EndGame. For all it's controversies, that was the comic's greatest battle ever.

I doubt it'll ever be topped.
Posted Image

#14 Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

    Everybody's Favorite Uncle ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Moderators
  • 12,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lowell, Massachusetts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:02 PM

is Dark Sonic the one from Secret Rings??
Some say that he knows 2 facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. And that 61 years ago he accidentally introduced Her Majesty The Queen to a Greek racialist. All we know is, I'm going to the tower now to have my head cut off, and he is called The Stig.

#15 PuffinGrandeur

PuffinGrandeur

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 472 posts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:16 PM

It's stupid. It's really, really stupid. It's Sonic going Super Sayijin for no reason in a franchise where that's already present as a gag. It's the type of thing only a teenager could ever think was cool.
It's a tiny scene from Sonic X where Sonic gets glowy when he's angry, and then beats two robots who were built to counter him in seconds. Secret Rings is Darkspine Sonic.

This set of ideas has lots of problems, but it's easy enough to just say it's a bunch of fandom whining condensed into a story outline.

#16 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:33 PM

is Dark Sonic the one from Secret Rings??


No, it's originally from an episode of Sonic X in Season 3.

It's stupid. It's really, really stupid. It's Sonic going Super Sayijin for no reason in a franchise where that's already present as a gag. It's the type of thing only a teenager could ever think was cool.
It's a tiny scene from Sonic X where Sonic gets glowy when he's angry, and then beats two robots who were built to counter him in seconds.


I'll admit the whole scene with Dark Sonic's inception was mostly pointless considering that the robots didn't even put up a fight and Sonic only stayed as Dark Sonic for less than 30 seconds, even turning back to normal on Eggman's speech no less. Still, I think the concept of that form is really intriguing the more I think about it.

If it was properly explained and well written on how Sonic would turn into this form, how long he would stay that way, its pros/cons of its abilities and dangers, I would love to see it come back. This form could make his character all the more complex, something along the lines of STC's Sonic problems when dealing with Chaos Emeralds.

This set of ideas has lots of problems, but it's easy enough to just say it's a bunch of fandom whining condensed into a story outline.


You know, if you're going to say they're bad ideas, then please explain why.

Just labeling them as fandom whining isn't really fair on your part.
Posted Image

#17 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:58 PM

I have a strong suspicion they'll all be back, but heavily Segafied, just like what we saw with Sally's new design.

Ugh, I so hate that look.


I guess it's not for everyone. But we can all agree that it's much better than how she was previously depicted; with her curvy human-like body, large breasts, long hair and tiny hands. *shudder*

As long as she looks like a Sonic character, I'm perfectly fine with the new design.

Where did you hear Paul told Ian to expand his story?


I can't remember whether it was him or someone else at Archie.

Any idea that uses Dark Sonic is immediately dumb. No takebacks.


It depends on the depiction. The reason why most people like the "Dark Sonic" form is because "Sonic X" is the most widely known show featuring Sonic. And since the dark-form only appeared once in the entire series for a few minutes, it left many viewers confused as to what it was.

However, the concept isn't new. Fleetway's "Sonic the Comic" already did something similar with their depiction of Super Sonic. Instead of the Super Saiyan-wannabe as seen in the games, they depicted the super-form as a psychotic demon taking possession of Sonic's body that's willing to kill everything it sees (both enemies and friends). Just look up "Fleetway" on Google search and you're bound to find several pictures of the character.

As for which one I like better, that's a rather tough choice since I like both. I like the creepy/eerie look of Dark Sonic, but I also like the psychopathic appearance and personality of Fleetway's Super Sonic.

#18 PuffinGrandeur

PuffinGrandeur

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 472 posts

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:07 AM

It's a complete shattering of what the character is, and a betrayal of his core concepts while again, being incredibly stupid. Fleetway's Super Sonic was better and it wasn't deep AT ALL.

I'm not going through the plotholes, or the multiple issue fight scene, the gigantic deus ex machina that Super Sonic is used as, or the fact that several characters just get dumped out entirely (bye Amy,) but the fact that the major theme is "nothing can happen to the status quo or characters unless it's reversed before there's any time to react" shows off just how much the writer doesn't really want to see good stories, just their beloved characters doing the same old shtick over and over and over again. It's fandom driving the plot, not storytelling.

#19 LaserX5

LaserX5

    Sonic Satam Purist

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Confidential

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:11 AM

I guess it's not for everyone. But we can all agree that it's much better than how she was previously depicted; with her curvy human-like body, large breasts, long hair and tiny hands. *shudder*

As long as she looks like a Sonic character, I'm perfectly fine with the new design.


Honestly, I didn't mind her having long hair and tiny hands. In fact, it made her look more like a woman. She's a Princess, so why not look the part? Large breasts on the other hand? Err, yea... I definitely did not like that at all. Unless they're going to properly covered up, why show something that provocative?

As for looking like a Sonic character, ok, she should, but Sally doesn't need a traced over Amy Rose design to see that happen. Other than the vest and gorilla hands, I thought Sally was fine the way she was.

I mean, she already in a sense looked like a Sonic character, but had her own unique identity.

Not so anymore.


I can't remember whether it was him or someone else at Archie.


Oh...

Well, if you can find some evidence of this, let me know. If Paul is indeed the main culprit for this story getting dragged on pointlessly, then he should held accountable for it.


It depends on the depiction. The reason why most people like the "Dark Sonic" form is because "Sonic X" is the most widely known show featuring Sonic. And since the dark-form only appeared once in the entire series for a few minutes, it left many viewers confused as to what it was.

However, the concept isn't new. Fleetway's "Sonic the Comic" already did something similar with their depiction of Super Sonic. Instead of the Super Saiyan-wannabe as seen in the games, they depicted the super-form as a psychotic demon taking possession of Sonic's body that's willing to kill everything it sees (both enemies and friends). Just look up "Fleetway" on Google search and you're bound to find several pictures of the character.


I'll agree there are some similarities, but I see Dark Sonic as more of an extreme rage form of Sonic's if he gets completely ticked off. The evil Sonic Sonic form of STC on the hand was more due to the Chaos Emeralds being a dangerous weapon.

It's almost in the sense like going mad with power.


It's a complete shattering of what the character is, and a betrayal of his core concepts while again, being incredibly stupid. Fleetway's Super Sonic was better and it wasn't deep AT ALL.


How is Sonic losing all self control and becoming this due to his rage against seeing his friends getting hurt shattering his character? If anything, it makes him more complex and noble in a sense as a hero.

Like I said, how Dark Sonic was played out was dumb. It wasn't very thought out and very confusing. That doesn't mean the concept was bad, but it was horribly executed.

I'm not going through the plotholes, or the multiple issue fight scene, the gigantic deus ex machina that Super Sonic is used as, or the fact that several characters just get dumped out entirely (bye Amy,) but the fact that the major theme is "nothing can happen to the status quo or characters unless it's reversed before there's any time to react" shows off just how much the writer doesn't really want to see good stories, just their beloved characters doing the same old shtick over and over and over again. It's fandom driving the plot, not storytelling.


Well, if you can't give your reasons why you don't like it, then why criticize it? You don't like it, fine, but he has the right to his ideas and opinions.

And when did he ever imply he wants the same old stuff over and over? That's not the reason why Ian's story is awful to him, or me for that matter, but the fact it is so shallow and biased.

Unless the SegaSonic cast is fair game to this "status quo change", what's the point of blasting all the beloved comic cast heroes with trauma just so they can shine in their place? That's not storytelling. That's utter laziness. We all know Sega's cast is never going to get hurt thanks to those asinine mandates, so that completely removes any sense of unpredictability this kind of story could have led to.
Posted Image

#20 LogiTeeka

LogiTeeka

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:06 AM

Honestly, I didn't mind her having long hair and tiny hands. In fact, it made her look more like a woman. She's a Princess, so why not look the part? Large breasts on the other hand? Err, yea... I definitely did not like that at all. Unless they're going to properly covered up, why show something that provocative?

As for looking like a Sonic character, ok, she should, but Sally doesn't need a traced over Amy Rose design to see that happen. Other than the vest and gorilla hands, I thought Sally was fine the way she was.

I mean, she already in a sense looked like a Sonic character, but had her own unique identity.

Not so anymore.


I guess it's just me, but it really bugs me when there are cartoon characters with completely different, clashing designs. I mean, the SegaSonic style takes influence from classic cartoon characters like Mickey Mouse and Popeye. They have large heads, hands, and feet; noodle-like limbs, and a small body. Amy Rose is female, but she still has comically large hands (though not as big as Sonic's).

Sally's original design, however, had a more realistic depiction. When you partner a realistic-looking character with a cartoonier character, they don't mesh well. It's best to try and find a common ground to base everything around and make the characters blend in better.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users