Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What I Feel Could Be 3 Possible Outcomes Of The Settlement Agreement Of The Penders Vs Archie Case
#61
Posted 02 January 2013 - 02:42 PM

"Everyone creates the thing that they dread. Men of peace create engines of war. Invaders create Avengers. People create... smaller people...? CHILDREN! (chuckles) Lost the word there..."
#62
Posted 02 January 2013 - 03:12 PM
Can you blame Ian for this? He was forced to do this because of the lawsuit. If he defied a major mandate from either Archie or SEGA, he probably be booted off as head writer of the comic. At least Ian didn't killed or written off most of Ken Pender's creations in a horrible fashion. Unless Thrash uses the warp ring to teleport the Echidnas to a location for their deaths. Though I wonder what would he do with Alicia Acorn, Sonic's Parents, Tail's Parents, Leeta, Lyco, and Harvey Who since they're Ken's creations and are recently important to the arc and the past.
Is there any evidence that proves the courts ruled that the comic cannot use these characters anymore?
You know, it really looks like this is just Archie Sonic flipping the bird at Penders by taking out his characters for spite as a result of his lawsuit.
#63
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:14 PM
The target demographic for this comic is kids. Little kids. Little kids who don't know s*** from shinola, get D minuses on every test, and rot their brains watching Spongebob and Hannah Montana.
Well that explains most of the fans who have grown up with the title for the past 20 years then.
Well the thing is we don't know the exact details behind all this. I think if they were getting rid of these characters for good, it's possible it would of been flat out stated. It's possible that for the time being, they are being put away so something can be worked out. And that's if this is down to the whole Ken Penders thing. This is just the Echidna characters afterall, and and Ken "pedophile moustache" Penders has created other characters that are still being used in the comic. It's possible that he just wants flat out control of the Echidna characters and doesn't really care much about the others since I believe it's been stated that the Knuckles comic was Ken's baby hence why he wants all those characters.
However, I think it's a fuckin shame that Archie seems to have given in to this bat shit insane weirdo. I mean these are just secondary characters in a licensed comic afterall. This isn't exactly a big a deal as some of the creators of characters like Superman or Ghostrider have had to go through with the likes of Marvel and DC. And these be actual original creations, not recoloured Echindas based off a character from a video game.
"The Devil Inside is the new scam from director William Something Something. The movie stars actors and was edited on a computer. Somewhere. This movie is the latest film in a series of very low budget films designed to look like real movies! And be released in theaters to make a quick buck via a horribly off kilter budget to profit ratio that the general public seem to be stupidly unaware of! These films use to be called 'direct to video' but now they are called 'first run features'. These films then vanish from the theaters, like a rapist leaving the scene of a crime." - Mike Stoklasa of RedLetterMedia
#64
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:40 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












