Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


Photo

New Hatred For Steven Butler


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 October 2012 - 07:22 AM

Be a little bit more clear about it then next time Ponyman.


What's unclear about "Too bad that doing this with a comic book isn't a realistic idea... assigning multiple artists to handle the individual panels on a page would involve too much micromanagement"?

#22 RedAuthar

RedAuthar

    The Spambot Killer.

  • Admins
  • 37,785 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knothole

Posted 09 October 2012 - 07:50 AM

It involved reading.

#23 Prime

Prime

    Shuffle up the Wildcards! And deal 'em!

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 497 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:01 AM

It involved reading.


Too right! Reading's overrated. Gimme them talking, moving pictures anyday.
'Star Wars' is my story, just like my house is my house. So if I wanna paint my house green, even if everyone else thinks it should be red, guess what? I'm gonna paint it Jar Jar! - George Lucas

"The Devil Inside is the new scam from director William Something Something. The movie stars actors and was edited on a computer. Somewhere. This movie is the latest film in a series of very low budget films designed to look like real movies! And be released in theaters to make a quick buck via a horribly off kilter budget to profit ratio that the general public seem to be stupidly unaware of! These films use to be called 'direct to video' but now they are called 'first run features'. These films then vanish from the theaters, like a rapist leaving the scene of a crime." - Mike Stoklasa of RedLetterMedia

#24 PuffinGrandeur

PuffinGrandeur

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 472 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 08:29 AM

Is Corto Maltese's art boring because it was all done by Hugo Pratt? Is The Spirit boring because Will Eisner worked on it so long? Donald Duck and Scrooge, because of Carl Barks and Don Rosa? I say this because I see the argument pop up all the time when artists do change up ("if they stayed the same it would be boring!") but I have literally never seen anybody complain that a single artist or style is working on a book too long when the art is good.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users