Well, after all of us found out what Sally's fate is going to be, i think it's safe to say that with alot of the long time fans of not only the SatAM show, but also the comic itself, are not liking the direction that Ian is going with this. There's going to be alot of bashing on his end about what he's doing to certain characters.
Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sth #232 And Su #35 Previews
Started by Shadow, Sep 14 2011 05:14 PM
123 replies to this topic
#81
Speedy_25
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 680 posts
SatAM Vet. (knew the show since it first came out)
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR
Posted 10 October 2011 - 07:43 AM
#82
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 10 October 2011 - 12:22 PM
I wouldn't say Ian and I are friends. Sometimes, I do wonder why I haven't been banned, like some others that I do know have, because I have been harsh on his message board.
Well, Ian must like or respect you somewhat, because he doesn't hesistate to ban others who speak their mind about his decision making.
A few I know on FUS and SMS haven't been so lucky.
I haven't been banned on BKF either, but I haven't been so vocal on there, just because I don't see the point.
I mean, Ian has too many supporters on his site for it to do any good.
Most of the decisons he makes, they're like... Yea, well done, Ian. Nice job.
#83
PuffinGrandeur
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 472 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 10 October 2011 - 01:11 PM
We just talked about this.
#84
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 10 October 2011 - 02:24 PM
We just talked about this.
I'm not lying here.
bwrosas and another on SMS called Mrsandman was banned from BKF
You can ask them yourself if you don't believe me.
#85
PuffinGrandeur
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 472 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 10 October 2011 - 05:42 PM
No need, I looked up the banned list. It took them months to get around to banning him, and even then he came back two more times. For some reason, I doubt it was because he dared to make a comment that had a different opinion, especially when THERE ARE MULTIPLE USERS RIGHT NOW who are doing the same thing. It takes some serious bias to think that bwrosas could only be ever banned because the admin couldn't stand a dissenter existing in their ranks.
I don't even know who Mrsandman is and I really do not care.
I don't even know who Mrsandman is and I really do not care.
#86
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 10 October 2011 - 08:30 PM
I don't even know who Mrsandman is and I really do not care.
Then that proves you didn't do all your homework about this.
He was banned for that very reason months ago.
He known on there on BK as, Geki the reviewer
Perhaps you remember some of his topics. He wasn't exactly known for holding back when criticizing Ian.
Anyway, maybe bwrosas did exaggerate a lil about all those getting banned.
But one thing I do know, Ian is very specific about not wanting any criticism about his work. And that kind of tells me he can't handle it.
If what you're saying is true that he isn't banning anyone now, then that can only mean he's too busy to bother with it now due to 230 coming out.
Perhaps he wants to shut up his critics that way instead of just kicking them out.
#87
bwrosas
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 398 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 10 October 2011 - 10:23 PM
A video response by me, on Genesis, why yes, and comments are welcomed
#88
PuffinGrandeur
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 472 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 10 October 2011 - 10:55 PM
Oh god Geki the Reviewer, yes I DEFINITELY know that guy and wow he was not banned for having a different opinion. He also took months to get banned, so it clearly wasn't for something you can discern before a hundred posts or so. Meanwhile, I can explicitly name a whole lot of posters who've been giving criticism for the comic, both constructive and otherwise, for a VERY long time. I'd rather not do so in the public forum, but if you need a PM of that sort I can give you a small sampling of them. And now you're stating that Ian is currently trying to get rid of any critics by... doing nothing. Brain genius logic there.
#89
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 10 October 2011 - 11:19 PM
Oh god Geki the Reviewer, yes I DEFINITELY know that guy and wow he was not banned for having a different opinion.
And you know this how?
I saw alot of his posts on there. He would even make topics, calling out Archie and Ian, saying they could do a better job in so many words.
You can't tell me they didn't play a part in him getting perm banned.
And now you're stating that Ian is currently trying to get rid of any critics by... doing nothing. Brain genius logic there.
You didn't read my post throughly.
I said, PERHAPS that's what he's doing. It was just a thought I had.
I heard he was going to New York for something regarding Sonic, so yea, it could be he's just very busy at the moment.
I honestly don't know.
But I also refuse to believe Ian all of a sudden is no longer banning people for criticizing him. There must be some reason why he's holding back for now.
#90
PuffinGrandeur
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 472 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 11 October 2011 - 12:26 AM
Yeah, the reason is that he never did it in the first place. I'm not denying that Geki didn't like the comic, I'm saying that's not at all why he was banned. He was banned because he acted like an idiot and ignored every rule there was. I'm actually surprised he wasn't permabanned the first time he posted full scans of the comic, that was back when it was an absolute rule. And you're still thinking that Ian is actively getting rid of naysayers by DOING NOTHING TO DISSUADE THEM. Do you not see how that line of logic just falls apart entirely? And again: still lots of people who disagree, have disagreed for a long time (long before 230) and give criticism on the comic that are in no way banned. Are those just being ignored because they make the accusation less plausible?
#91
Vampfox
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 200 posts
Fellow FUSer
- Gender:Male
- Location:In my coffin waiting for the sun to go down
Posted 11 October 2011 - 12:33 AM
I also remember Geki the Reviewer. I couldn't stand that guy. He became really annoying and mean towards other users on Ian's forum.
#92
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 11 October 2011 - 12:49 AM
And you're still thinking that Ian is actively getting rid of naysayers by DOING NOTHING TO DISSUADE THEM. Do you not see how that line of logic just falls apart entirely? And again: still lots of people who disagree, have disagreed for a long time (long before 230) and give criticism on the comic that are in no way banned. Are those just being ignored because they make the accusation less plausible?
You sure do like to put words in my mouth, don't you?
I never said this is what he is doing. I was just trying to come up with a reason for why he's doing it now.
In fact, I remember back after 225 was released, when those talking about Sally's fate quite extensively, Ian wasn't exactly that mellow about it.
Also, I remember he even locked a thread because he, "wanted everyone to cool off. Including him."
What does that tell you?
Anyway, again, I'll say this so you understand.
I do not know for sure why he's easing off all of a sudden, ok?
After that full cover of 232 was released, it's like he finally gave it up, like he didn't care anymore what people thought. He even began to open to everyone about his true intentions too.
Why, who knows?
If you think my guesses are off based for trying to explain it, and yes, that's what they are, then fine. Think what you want for all I care.
Ian is a very hard person to figure out. So why he does things when he does them is a mystery.
#93
PuffinGrandeur
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 472 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 11 October 2011 - 12:58 AM
And I'm saying that he's not 'easing up' because he never did the thing you're accusing him of. Sally's death caused lots of fights which exasperated EVERYBODY including him. The problem was not people who didn't like Sally dead, it was the tons of fights breaking out over it. And yet... I don't remember all the naysayers being banned for it. Hrm. You know, it's really odd that for a guy who bans everyone with a different opinion or criticism of the comic, he never seems to ban people for having a different opinion or criticism of the comic...
#95
Shadow
-
- Sonic Corner Moderator
- 3,245 posts
Fellow FUSer
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
Posted 13 October 2011 - 02:03 AM
#96
blue
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 355 posts
Veteran poster
- Gender:Male
Posted 13 October 2011 - 08:12 AM
Looks like the 2 kangaroos are back since issue 40. Though the cover might deceive us that there is a real trial.
#97
bwrosas
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 398 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 13 October 2011 - 05:05 PM
What this has to do with sally, well just take watch and listen
#98
bwrosas
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 398 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 30 December 2011 - 11:15 AM
Can anyone sense and say "Sonic's possibly having a prophetic dream like he did in a certain webcomic. Just saying 
#99
LaserX5
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 1,188 posts
Sonic Satam Purist
- Gender:Male
- Location:Confidential
Posted 30 December 2011 - 02:25 PM
Can anyone sense and say "Sonic's possibly having a prophetic dream like he did in a certain webcomic. Just saying
To be honest, I actually would love to see this latest story arc end up that way.
But, I seriously doubt Sega and Archie will let Ian do that.
It would in fact, as I've said before, be the ultimate cop-out.
#100
bwrosas
-
- Fellow FUSer
-
- 398 posts
Fellow FUSer
Posted 31 December 2011 - 01:14 AM
Oh how about the fact that Sonic points out the fact to Knuckles that being on Angel Island, he and the Chaotix should have the Death Egg coming and could have warned them.
And I will admit this, what sense does it make for Ian to kill Sally at the end of 225, restore/save her in 230 (Genesis excepted) and then turn into a robot at the end of the Same issue and what I saw coming a MILE AWAY, having Eggman working on and possibly dismantling her off panel/off screen in 232, I mean what sense does that make? None really if you ask me, which leads to believe that it's possibly something more then meets the eye.
And I will admit this, what sense does it make for Ian to kill Sally at the end of 225, restore/save her in 230 (Genesis excepted) and then turn into a robot at the end of the Same issue and what I saw coming a MILE AWAY, having Eggman working on and possibly dismantling her off panel/off screen in 232, I mean what sense does that make? None really if you ask me, which leads to believe that it's possibly something more then meets the eye.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
