Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


Photo

Net Neutrality... Again?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 12 August 2010 - 03:15 PM

http://www.popsci.co...osal-kind-scary

Google and Verizon's proposal


Okay well unlike the Net Neutrality debates and "what they want to do" from before, they seem to be concentrating mainly on how wireless networks are the way of the soon to be future.

"Google and Verizon announced a joint vision for the future of net neutrality this afternoon--a plan that may wield significant influence in the ever-intensifying debate over who controls the internet and its content. The plan calls for strictly regulated openness for today's wireline broadband--the DSL or cable internet you likely have at home. But for wireless networks (read: the future), the story is different. "


The Internet is constantly changing as we know. From dial up to high speed cables and now to what will become almost a fully wireless network.


Just read the article, see what you think of it. All in all its the same old debate but, with a few new twists added into it.

#2 Ratty Randnums

Ratty Randnums

    He of Little Sleep

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,385 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Milky Way

Posted 12 August 2010 - 04:50 PM

I wish net neutrality was named something more descriptive like "Net freedom of expression" or "Net right to anonymity and privacy". People don't realize how fully it affects their future and everyday lives because the name is just so damn bad and non-descriptive.
"I really think of life as a great expression of joy. And if you take yourself seriously you're going to be defeated I'm afraid.
...Maybe that is the whole recipe of life, is to be in on the joke. Because life is a joke and if you're not in on it you're out.
But if you're in on it, you can make it." - Vincent Price

"What have you got to lose? You know you come from nothing you're going back to nothing. What have you lost? Nothing!"
- Eric Idle

#3 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 14 August 2010 - 06:09 PM

And some of us are still stuck with dial-up... Stupid expensive high-speed internet in rural areas...

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#4 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 August 2010 - 08:46 PM

Hey chief, the link in your post is broken.

QUOTE (Ratty Randnums @ Aug 12 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wish net neutrality was named something more descriptive like "Net freedom of expression" or "Net right to anonymity and privacy".

It's not called those things because those things have nothing to do with it. tongue.gif "Net equality" might be something closer to what you're looking for.


#5 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 14 August 2010 - 08:54 PM

Fixed it. Thanks Kef.

#6 randomizer

randomizer

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,394 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Downunda

Posted 16 August 2010 - 01:26 AM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Aug 15 2010, 02:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not called those things because those things have nothing to do with it. tongue.gif

And also perhaps because privacy is nothing more than a figment of the imagination.

#7 BigWigRah

BigWigRah

    coming to a fridge near you

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 611 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 December 2010 - 01:01 PM

It's not like Net Neutrality would actually do anything to "protect" you. Honestly, it's like the FCC is looking for problems that don't really exist. What business do they have "regulating" anyway? The US courts have already shot down N.N. but they insist on implementing it. All it's going to do is make it more difficult for businesses to compete with each other, and put a damper on innovation. It's totally unnecessary, and it would probably lead to worse problems down the road once the FCC gets their foot in the door in deciding who fails and who succeeds. HANDS OFF.
Who Is John Galt?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users