You really can't blame people for wanting more dark themes in the comic.
Blame them? I suppose not. Be annoyed by their willingness to act as if this arbitrary idea of "Dark" storytelling is the end-all be-all of whether or not a story's any good? Absolutely, I can.
QUOTE
After all, Sonic Satam, which this comic was based off, was very dark, as well as epic.
But, see, the mere fact that SatAM was "dark" (and, as Kef said, it really wasn't
that "dark" in sum when you really look it over) only has so much to do with why it was a good series. You could have every last "dark" idea in SatAM kept intact, but if stripped of the elements of execution that made them work, like good writing, solid characterization, good plotlines, etc. etc., they would be utterly worthless.
Heck, look at
Sonic the Hedgehog 2006; it's full of "dark" ideas, like Death, emotional repression, dystopian futures, etc. etc. It is also a completely and utterly dreadful story. Why? Because the execution was a convoluted, poorly acted, poorly written mess. By contrast, look at
Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, which was pretty much nothing but "light" ideas. Hardly a perfect show, I grant you, but it could be highly enjoyable because it had good vocals, some clever writing, and a creative sense of humor.
That's not to say Ideas are meaningless to a story. Of course they aren't. But they only count as much as the people bringing them to life, and I think you deny yourself potentially rewarding or enjoyable stories by hinging your judgment of them on the "darkness" or "lightness" of the ideas behind it. Just my opinion, mind.
EDIT: Or, to put it more simply? I think we ought to be less concerned with whether or not we're getting "dark" or "light" stories, and more concerned about whether we're getting
good stories.