Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (25 July 2015 - 03:35 AM)

When was that? Depending on when it was, it might have been a DNS issue. Those should be gone now.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

on*

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

Red said he couldnt get one

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself


Photo

Ken Penders Suffers From Fatal Douche Attack


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

#21 GamemasterAnthony

GamemasterAnthony

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,068 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN, Earth

Posted 08 July 2010 - 06:09 AM

Yeah. Unfortunately for Mr. Pantsonheadretarded...er, Penders...Sega will probably have the last word on this since THEY technically have ownership of all the Sonic based characters. This includes all the ones created for the cartoons and comics as well. In fact if anyone has any merchandise with any of the SatAM characters on it, you'll probably notice that it says İSEGA on them...not İDiC.

#22 J.E.Smith

J.E.Smith

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 115 posts

Posted 08 July 2010 - 06:40 AM

This isn't the first time an Archie writer tried claiming ownership to their characters. In 2000, Dan DeCarlo tried filing a lawsuit against Archie claiming ownership for Josie and the Pussycats after the horrid live-action film came out. DeCarlo lost the suit and was fired from Archie as a result.

Seriously, if it didn't work for DeCarlo, why does Ken think it'll work for him?

#23 FreakyFilmFan4ever

FreakyFilmFan4ever

    The Resident Freaky Filmmaker

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The moon, playing amongst the stars.

Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:25 AM

People in the entertainment industry RARELY return to it after filing a lawsuit over creative issues. If you're suing over creative issues, EVEN IF YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT AND HAVE GROUNDS TO SUE, you should sue for enough to retire. Because you will never be hired to work in the industry again. Nobody wants to hire a legal problem.

Unfortunately, I don't think Ken Penders is in the right or even has sufficient ground to sue. So he'll probably just loose his career in the process without the characters/stories he wants. He should just take what he's learned and apply it to something that is clearly his own. Sure, it may appear similar for a while, but after enough work it will start to take on it's own identity.
I believe in what I want to believe in, you believe in what you want to believe in, so when someone wants to believe in something, no one will know what to believe!
Believe it or not...

StefanFilms
My Graphic Art Page

#24 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 July 2010 - 09:50 AM

My response to Ken Penders.

#25 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 08 July 2010 - 11:29 AM

So THATS where Miko hides out..

I agree with John on the Sonic Bitching. This is just a whole new story for both sides of the stupid fanboy spectrum to attack eachother.

#26 J.E.Smith

J.E.Smith

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 115 posts

Posted 08 July 2010 - 11:40 AM

Another thing that puzzles me about the whole thing...didn't Ken himself say many years ago (Late 90s perhaps?) that any character he made for the comic automatically became Sega's property? I remember reading something like that a long time ago, but I can't seem to dig it up (It was the one where he also stated that all fancharacters become Sega's property or something along those lines).

#27 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 08 July 2010 - 11:53 AM

One would think that it has to become either SEGA or Archies property. Thats all it is, working for a company voids out any copywrite claim you have providing that what you are doing is doing what you were hired to do.


I'm no lawyer or anything, and like Kef mentioned, maybe Penders had some awesome section in his contract that gave him certain rights.. who knows. All we can do is sit and wait.

However, like Freaky said.. I'm pretty sure he just fucked whatever career he had.

#28 J.E.Smith

J.E.Smith

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 115 posts

Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:28 PM

And Ian continues to assure us everything's going to be okay:

QUOTE
The Archie legal department is handling things. I've been told to keep writing as usual and to continue with our plans for the end of 2010/start of 2011. As I said before: no worries.

Bear in mind that I don't have all the information. All I'm going off of is my limited understanding of the ownership of things within the book and franchise. So unless Mr. Penders pulls a rabbit out of his hat, I feel fairly confident in my understanding of things.

1) Work-for-Hire - While I'm bound by my contract to not talk about my contract, I can say I'm work-for-hire. I've been on the book for five years (!!!) and I'm still freelance, part-time, on-the-side. All of my contributions to the book are for the book, and I'm paid for that.

All the stuff I came up with for "Young Salem" - Foreman Armstrong, Mortimer Destiny, the Lizarmyn, Horde Lord, concept, etc. - is Archie's. I can't do my own book under BKC about Mortimer and Felicia's younger days.

Sonic-wise, I have a harder parallel to draw since I've spent more time using the content within the book and taking it in new directions. I suppose Thrash is the best example, lean as he is character-wise. He's Archie's. Plain and simple.

Everyone on staff (and I include us freelancers when I say this) has to sign that contract. So unless Mr. Penders's contract was wildly different, he signed away those characters before he even created them.

2) SEGA - It is my understanding, as explained by Mr. Penders himself years ago on his forum - that ultimately SEGA owns everything in the book. If it's associated with Sonic in the book, it is by extension SEGA's. From my understanding, that is why BioWare could so freely emulate the Dark Legion for the Marauders.

I know there was some confusion elsewhere concerning rights to SatAM. As it was explained, SEGA owns the intellectual property - the characters and such - but DiC retains the rights to the animation. So you wouldn't see SEGA reselling SatAM boxsets willy-nilly. Conversely, DiC wouldn't be able to just up and make a new Sonic cartoon.

3) Reboot - Oh if I had a nickle for every time this word got tossed around. I've already begun material for 2011 and, as I said before, have been told there's no need to change. Not that we're blindly forging ahead, but that we have no reason to stop.

What would need a reboot, in the scenario that Mr. Penders somehow did win out in all this, is his plans. SEGA would not grant him the license to use Knuckles, I can flat-out tell you that with certainty. So right there the core component of the Echidna Lore - the main character - is gone.

He would not be able to use Angel Island, Mobius, or the Chaos Emeralds. Easy enough fix, though, right? It's Skyhigh Island on Terra using the Magi-Gems for flight. (copyright, by the way. Double-tappsies, no take-backs).

But the entire Echidna cast is comprised of Knuckles knock-offs. Mr. Penders would be required to redesign the entire cast, unless he's planning on trying to pass it off as parody (which I doubt).

By the time the property would be safe to touch, it would be unrecognizable. It's not about Knuckles's society or family. It's not about echidnas (the kind we think of, at least). It would now be a sci-fi-lite story about some dudes on a flying island. That could be interesting in its own right, but it's not the story I think Mr. Penders wants to tell, and it's not the one the echidna fans want to read. So I'm not entirely sure what his greater thinking is here.

Again, take my words with a grain of salt. I'm not privy to absolutely everything going on. But from what I do know I am confident I - and you all - have nothing to worry about.

So relax, curl up with the latest SONIC book, and enjoy it while ignoring the storm outside. This too shall pass.


#29 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 08 July 2010 - 08:06 PM

As pretty much everyone has said or thought.. Mr. Penders just dug himself into a deap whole that will end up being the grave of his career

#30 Lord Exor

Lord Exor

    Evil Incarnate

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 465 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A tank.

Posted 08 July 2010 - 10:32 PM

QUOTE (henryiii @ Jul 8 2010, 05:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (John Roberts @ Jul 8 2010, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I must have that graphic novel.

but.........................Is that even legal?


I will make it legal.


#31 henryiii

henryiii

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 211 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CA

Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:01 AM

More delicious bits from Ken's board. Bon appetit.

QUOTE
One thing that people should consider when discussing this matter is that unlike Marvel and DC Comics, Archie Comics has never believed in paying the creators at any time for reprints of their work. Neither Michael Gallagher nor Scott Shaw! were paid a dime when their initial 4-issue Sonic mini-series was collected into a trade paperback edition, nor has ANY creator been paid for any of their work currently being printed in the SONIC ARCHIVES series.

Meanwhile, Marvel and DC pay their creators royalties every time their work sees publication anywhere, even if it is used on licensed properties. I know this because I have several friends in the industry who receive regular royalty checks, unlike the creators who work for Archie. Indeed, many of the older artists could use the extra bucks the company generates from the Archie Digest reprints, but the company doesn't see fit to work things out with them. Why else do you think Dan DeCarlo of all people got fed up and decided to take Archie to court after working 40 years for them?

Fans are essentially subsidizing Archie screwing the creators by taking the attitude that Archie deserves everything when there is more than enough to go around and treat everyone fairly. By everyone, I mean everyone. That includes Mike K, Karl, Dave, Art, Spaz, Fry, Steve, Dawn and everyone else, including Ian. My actions have always been more than just about me. If I win, everyone who ever worked on the book will win. I would think Sonic fandom could support that stand


#32 Robthe1st

Robthe1st

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Orange County, CA

Posted 10 July 2010 - 01:27 PM

I can't beileve he do this! lipsrsealed.gif

I used to trust him and I've meet with him in person once, seems respectful. But now, he's truning his back against us! Shame on him!!



#33 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 10 July 2010 - 02:09 PM

http://www.tssznews....onic-comic-row/



I guess we wait till Monday. I would like to see all that Mr. Penders is claiming here.

#34 DCC

DCC

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 239 posts

Posted 11 July 2010 - 05:47 AM

Yes, this is interesting. It would make a great TV drama episode. I am not a lawyer but I don't see how Penders can win on the copyright issue(the royality issue maybe) since Sega does own the copyright to the Archie characters. We'll just have to wait and see how this turns out. I don't see this ruinning the comic. Even if this does end up killing the comic book, which I don't think it will, I will be fine with it as long as things end on a good note and with a happy ending for Sonic and Sally.

#35 Robthe1st

Robthe1st

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Orange County, CA

Posted 12 July 2010 - 02:38 PM

QUOTE (DCC @ Jul 11 2010, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes, this is interesting. It would make a great TV drama episode. I am not a lawyer but I don't see how Penders can win on the copyright issue(the royality issue maybe) since Sega does own the copyright to the Archie characters. We'll just have to wait and see how this turns out. I don't see this ruinning the comic. Even if this does end up killing the comic book, which I don't think it will, I will be fine with it as long as things end on a good note and with a happy ending for Sonic and Sally.


On second thought, I don't want to defend Ken, but, I don't think it's really an bad idea. Unless, if he owns Sonic, Sally, or the other charcters from the SatM Series, that would cause some trouble.

And, we'll see how it goes from Ken.

#36 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 12 July 2010 - 04:01 PM

http://www.tssznews....pyright-claims/

There ya have it. His copy write claims

#37 FreakyFilmFan4ever

FreakyFilmFan4ever

    The Resident Freaky Filmmaker

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The moon, playing amongst the stars.

Posted 12 July 2010 - 05:33 PM

See ya, Ken Penders! I don't ever expect you back in the industry ever again.
I believe in what I want to believe in, you believe in what you want to believe in, so when someone wants to believe in something, no one will know what to believe!
Believe it or not...

StefanFilms
My Graphic Art Page

#38 Juice16

Juice16

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 62 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison WI

Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:44 PM

Now doesn't Penders feel silly now? BYE BYE silly fool.

#39 Speedy_25

Speedy_25

    SatAM Vet. (knew the show since it first came out)

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 680 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:48 PM

Wow......that is all I can say......

#40 saber16

saber16

    Sea3on Artist

  • Sea3on Artist
  • 606 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 13 July 2010 - 12:43 AM

Awww... I was really looking forward to what he would do with Rob O’ the Hedge... You know... one of his own, totally original characters that he crafted with his own tears, sweat and blood?

... What the hell was he hoping to accomplish? Whatever, he had a good run and he left his mark on the Archie series.

Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users