Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (25 July 2015 - 03:35 AM)

When was that? Depending on when it was, it might have been a DNS issue. Those should be gone now.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

on*

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 10:10 PM)

Red said he couldnt get one

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself


Photo

Xbox Live Gamer Banned Till The Year 9999


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 Jman1236

Jman1236

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 524 posts
  • Location:Berkley, MI

Posted 19 April 2010 - 04:25 PM

link

"When inquiring about why his son had been banned from Xbox Live for the next eight thousand years, a father learned something that he probably didn't want to know.

In today's installment of "hilarious bans," we point you to the curious case of Xbox Live user "i am BlaaaacK v." The user in question was suspended from Microsoft's Xbox Live service for quite a while - until December 31st, 9999 - but no notification had ever been given.

The user's father posted an inquiry on the Xbox Forums asking why his son had been banned without reason. The response?

"Your son was exposing himself on camera in Uno."

I would think that would be a very good reason to ban someone for the next eight millennia, actually - especially given we don't know the ages of any of the parties involved. But yes, there is probably a father getting ready to have a very serious talk with his son right about now.

It's okay, though. The guy can always hang out with the one Monster Hunter 3 cheater whose sentence was just slightly less harsh. Misery does love company, after all."


#2 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 April 2010 - 06:15 PM

Couldn't they have just permanently taken away his webcam privileges or something?

#3 ALIENwolve

ALIENwolve

    That one guy that doesn't do anything.

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 149 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 April 2010 - 07:35 PM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Apr 19 2010, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Couldn't they have just permanently taken away his webcam privileges or something?
If you're a moderator and somebody's shoving his dick into your onscreen camera, you don't take it lightly.
This is a legally binding sentence.

#4 The Man

The Man

    Mind Bullets a.k.a. Telekinesis

  • B&'ed
  • 804 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Castle of clouds.

Posted 19 April 2010 - 10:33 PM

What about everyone else?

#5 chalcara

chalcara

    Oh the stupidity!

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 638 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 20 April 2010 - 12:46 AM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Apr 20 2010, 04:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Couldn't they have just permanently taken away his webcam privileges or something?


Why would you want to leave him with the option to be a fucktard over text/voicechat? He's proven to be an ideot, so good riddance. He'd continue to make trouble.
Read my comic Traces of Chaos - currently updating Thursdays
Visit my blog Imaginary Skies - Happily building Cloud-Castles since 1981.

"Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God. And if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out!"
Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5

#6 Valerie Valens

Valerie Valens

    Ein Fahrender Ritter

  • F3 Staff
  • 768 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:HK, China

Posted 20 April 2010 - 02:48 AM

Exposing himself in Uno? What in the fuck!? O_o

76561197990969478.png


#7 Ratty Randnums

Ratty Randnums

    He of Little Sleep

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,385 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Milky Way

Posted 20 April 2010 - 06:23 AM

I agree, what the fuck. On another note though, lol it appears someone at Microsoft still enjoys a good "Over 9000!" joke.
"I really think of life as a great expression of joy. And if you take yourself seriously you're going to be defeated I'm afraid.
...Maybe that is the whole recipe of life, is to be in on the joke. Because life is a joke and if you're not in on it you're out.
But if you're in on it, you can make it." - Vincent Price

"What have you got to lose? You know you come from nothing you're going back to nothing. What have you lost? Nothing!"
- Eric Idle

#8 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 April 2010 - 07:46 AM

Context plays a role here. If he was egged on to do it by everybody there and everybody said they wanted to see it, that's different from if he just did it out of the blue, or if he did it despite protests. Still ban-worthy, no doubt, but I think the former wouldn't merit a punishment that's quite as harsh. More of a slap on the wrist than a punch to the face.

If on the other hand the game could be seen by, say, a number of anonymous spectators -- not having played Xbox Live, I don't know how it works -- then there's pretty much no excuse at all, though.

QUOTE ("Ratty Randnums")
lol it appears someone at Microsoft still enjoys a good "Over 9000!" joke.

I don't see one anywhere. I know 9999 is over 9000, but that's not really sufficient for it to be a reference (Dec. 31, 9999 is probably the highest date it can store anyhow).

#9 Ratty Randnums

Ratty Randnums

    He of Little Sleep

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,385 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Milky Way

Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:22 AM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Apr 20 2010, 04:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Context plays a role here. If he was egged on to do it by everybody there and everybody said they wanted to see it, that's different from if he just did it out of the blue, or if he did it despite protests. Still ban-worthy, no doubt, but I think the former wouldn't merit a punishment that's quite as harsh. More of a slap on the wrist than a punch to the face.

If on the other hand the game could be seen by, say, a number of anonymous spectators -- not having played Xbox Live, I don't know how it works -- then there's pretty much no excuse at all, though.

QUOTE ("Ratty Randnums")
lol it appears someone at Microsoft still enjoys a good "Over 9000!" joke.

I don't see one anywhere. I know 9999 is over 9000, but that's not really sufficient for it to be a reference (Dec. 31, 9999 is probably the highest date it can store anyhow).

Are you suuuuuurrrre?
"I really think of life as a great expression of joy. And if you take yourself seriously you're going to be defeated I'm afraid.
...Maybe that is the whole recipe of life, is to be in on the joke. Because life is a joke and if you're not in on it you're out.
But if you're in on it, you can make it." - Vincent Price

"What have you got to lose? You know you come from nothing you're going back to nothing. What have you lost? Nothing!"
- Eric Idle

#10 XaverJin

XaverJin

    Thats XJ to you.

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 208 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England

Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:58 AM

Being on Xbox Live is enough to drive anyone to insanity.

#11 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:17 PM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Apr 20 2010, 10:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Context plays a role here. If he was egged on to do it by everybody there and everybody said they wanted to see it, that's different from if he just did it out of the blue, or if he did it despite protests. Still ban-worthy, no doubt, but I think the former wouldn't merit a punishment that's quite as harsh. More of a slap on the wrist than a punch to the face.

If on the other hand the game could be seen by, say, a number of anonymous spectators -- not having played Xbox Live, I don't know how it works -- then there's pretty much no excuse at all, though.

People have to be made accountable for their actions. That's part of what's wrong with modern society: Everyone wants to be able to get away with everything and blame it on someone else. In such a situation, they should ban everyone involved, not give one offender a slap on the wrist. Punch all of the sickos in the face. People who do sick stuff like this should have their junk removed, so they wouldn't be capable of doing it again.

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#12 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:54 PM

Overreact much?

#13 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 20 April 2010 - 10:11 PM

QUOTE (furrykef @ Apr 21 2010, 12:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Overreact much?

Better than underreaction... As the saying goes: "Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out"... If we let the punishment fit the offense more often, there would be fewer offenders, and far fewer repeat offenders...

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#14 Valerie Valens

Valerie Valens

    Ein Fahrender Ritter

  • F3 Staff
  • 768 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:HK, China

Posted 21 April 2010 - 05:35 AM

No. An eye for an eye makes the world go blind.

76561197990969478.png


#15 Tristan Palmgren

Tristan Palmgren

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 371 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 06:41 AM

So it's a fair punishment to maim people for being douchebags on the Internet?

Cool. I'll see you in a few minutes, Vlad smile.gif I'll bring my scissors.

#16 furrykef

furrykef

    Fellow FUSer

  • Tech Guy
  • 3,983 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 April 2010 - 06:17 PM

QUOTE (Valerie Valens @ Apr 21 2010, 08:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No. An eye for an eye makes the world go blind.


Sed in regione caecorum, rex est luscus!

("But in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king!")


#17 John Roberts

John Roberts

    It's a nativity scene, except nobody here is wise

  • Admins
  • 2,589 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Darwin, Australia

Posted 22 April 2010 - 07:30 PM

QUOTE (Tristan Palmgren @ Apr 21 2010, 11:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So it's a fair punishment to maim people for being douchebags on the Internet?

Cool. I'll see you in a few minutes, Vlad smile.gif I'll bring my scissors.

icon_cheers.gif I'll drink to that.
6620

9:06

#18 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 22 April 2010 - 07:52 PM

Yeah cheers to that Tristan

#19 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 22 April 2010 - 09:09 PM

QUOTE (Valerie Valens @ Apr 21 2010, 08:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No. An eye for an eye makes the world go blind.

No. It just makes a lot of people invest in eyepatches. The quote only works if you're talking about revenge, which can be a cycle of violence. Punishing people for criminal offenses is not revenge. It's justice. And if properly done, is a deterrent to would-be future criminals.

QUOTE (Tristan Palmgren @ Apr 21 2010, 09:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So it's a fair punishment to maim people for being douchebags on the Internet?

Cool. I'll see you in a few minutes, Vlad smile.gif I'll bring my scissors.

No. It's fair punishment to maim sex offenders and other criminals. Douchebags are only punishable by for being a douchebag IRL, as everyone on the internet is a douchebag to some extent. Usually by blackening their eyes and breaking their noses.

Though, you're welcome to try... Just don't expect to be able to walk away from the attempt...

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#20 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 22 April 2010 - 09:13 PM

Ohhh no! Vlad is angry ohmy.gif




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users