QUOTE
I don't see what wrong with Sonic protecting a kingdom, which by itself is the very symbol of the very type of freedom Sonic fights fore. And how is it interfering with his life if he's helping his friends with the very thing he and they want? The very friends he grew up with and the same girl he played with and fought with for years with. Whats the point of having a love for freedom, if you don't want to get committed to help and to not have responsibilities to others?
It kinda makes Sonic sound selfish and hypocritical in a way. Sonic should be a noble individual, not some ones who says fuck you am doing this my way and no one elses
Sonic is somewhat selfish, but there's nothing hypocritical about it. He fights for personal freedom and entertainment: he believes that EVERYBODY has the right to live the way they want, not just him. He stops Dr. Eggman because it's the right thing to do, not because of a personal obligation TELLING him he has to stop the guy. Also, fighting for a monarchy is a very silly way to fight for freedom anyway, seeing as all it means is changing over which guy is telling everybody what to do. It's not really fighting for freedom then, as much as fighting for feudalism. But with Sonic stuck in one place anyway, might as well.
Also a love for freedom only meaning something if you force yourself into a commitment and responsibility for others is somewhat silly, as that is just limiting your freedom of your own accord. It's not a BAD thing to do by any means, but it certainly doesn't really fit with the major character theme here. Which is PERSONAL freedom, not democracy, just as a reminder. There can be nobility without the traditional knight image, and Sonic stands as an example of that, even in the comics. Heck, even in the cartoons!
QUOTE
Again, what's wrong with Sonic having depth and having feelings with someone who can balance him by being his voice of reason and to have someone that just makes him a better person and character?
Well, two things. First, that's not an appropriate response, since I didn't say Sonic shouldn't have any depth or feelings. In fact, my statement was that he not only has both, but that both can be and are properly explored WITHOUT him wanting to mack a girl up (I... I don't know slang.) If the only way Sonic's character has any depth at all is to date a character that either treats him like a little kid or a pet, then THAT'S troubling. Secondly, to assume that a free character being weighed down by a character based on responsibilities is automatically made BETTER and deeper because of it is just silly. What does it REALLY add, that makes stripping away his central theme so very necessary? Is a character without responsibility REALLY that much less of one?