Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


A Nightmare on Elm Street remake.


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#21 Shadow

Shadow

    Fellow FUSer

  • Sonic Corner Moderator
  • 3,245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 26 November 2009 - 03:13 AM

Here is a good show of his face by the new toy.I am pissed.

The original Freddy was supposed to look inhumane, as he was a walking avatar of pain. No regular human could endure the burns he had and live which fell into the dream logic even more that he was such a overblown nightmare reflecting reality that the skin was on the verge of melting off his body.
Wheres the permanent scowl,the grin,the hook nose,and the gaping holes all along his cheeks?

This Freddy fails so hard.By trying to pull the realism tactic,the makeup effects have fallen short by 60 years. This Freddy doesn't even look all that badly burnt. Second degree burns that have healed over. Look at Two Face from The Dark Knight.He looked WAY worse and was alot more horrifying to look at.

This is the Freddy we should have got.



IxXnFrm.png


#22 John Roberts

John Roberts

    It's a nativity scene, except nobody here is wise

  • Admins
  • 2,589 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Darwin, Australia

Posted 26 November 2009 - 04:01 AM

That's just the toy, right? It isn't exactly film quality there. I'm still in the wait and see camp before I go all hateful. I remember the 'hatred' that followed the very early shots of Heath Ledger as the Joker, and we all know how great that turned out.
6620

9:06

#23 Guest_KorbenDallas_*

Guest_KorbenDallas_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 26 November 2009 - 01:54 PM



Now that looks like a good new Freddy! oh come on, this movie will make Freddy scary again instead of him saying so much one-liners.

But isn't Saw already the new generation's Nightmare on Elm Street? in terms of a horror franchise and horror icon.

#24 John Roberts

John Roberts

    It's a nativity scene, except nobody here is wise

  • Admins
  • 2,589 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Darwin, Australia

Posted 26 November 2009 - 05:05 PM

Saw? Kinda not. It's a bankable franchise, that's for sure. Doesn't mean it's iconic.
6620

9:06

#25 Xian Shade

Xian Shade

    Professional Lurker

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 156 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 November 2009 - 06:33 AM

Saw has two things going for it that Nightmare didn't: ongoing story, and (usually) self-inflicting pain and death.

I will admit that the new image of Freddy DOES look more like a serious burn victim (I've seen a few, went to kindergarden with one) and the lack of serious lighting/background might be throwing off the 'good' look he might have. I never minded it before, but looking at images of the old Freddy, he kinda looks more like someone with Leprosy rather than someone who was burnt...

But like I said before, all this change is naught unless our new bogeyman can pull off the same mentality as the old bogeyman.
"Bad robot ninjas have kidnapped the wildlife. Are you a fast enough Hedgehog to save the wildlife?" ~RScoKm
"I could tell my parents hated me. My bath toys were a toaster and a radio." ~Rodney Dangerfield
"My luck is so bad that if I bought a cemetery, people would stop dying." ~Ed Furgol
"Bad taste is simply saying the truth before it should be said." ~Mel Brooks
"Walruses are among the only mammals in the world that do not process liquid waste via a bladder organ. Once digested, liquid waste is absorbed through the lining of the small intestine and secreted through the skin." That's why people ignored Rotor." ~anonymous
"If there were a building that stood for grammatical integrity, your post would be the plane that crashed into it." ~ThePeaGuy
"NO! No summoning evil gods! Bad Mel!" ~Crais Sewell, Mimana Iyar Chronicle

#26 Guest_KorbenDallas_*

Guest_KorbenDallas_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 06 December 2009 - 05:43 PM

So you don't think Saw lives up to other franchises like Elm Street, Friday The 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Child's Play, Hellraiser or others? what about Scream or Final Destination?

And do you think Jackie will make a good Freddy?

#27 Shadow

Shadow

    Fellow FUSer

  • Sonic Corner Moderator
  • 3,245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 06 December 2009 - 08:00 PM

From what I read, its a rehash duplicate of the original NOES film. Except it doesn't have the blood geyser death. I'm probably the most hardcore Freddy fan around here and to me, it feels like this film is being made for all the wrong reasons. Its just a simple cash grab on the remake band wagon. What the hell was wrong with just making a new Freddy movie with a numberless title so it could go at any given point and time? Robert Englund was not too fucking old to play Freddy. He's only in his 60's and has had stunt doubles through all the films do the hard parts for him. Freddy vs Jason proved the actor was more than capable of still doing the character where he did the most physical acting in all, and that film was only made 6 years ago.

SAW was not memorable for Jigsaw the character but the traps themselves. The gore itself took over as the center point of the series with Jigsaws presence downplayed with each movie grasping at thinner straws to conceive new reasons for him to keep doing this. See, Jigsaw is a human that wasn't meant for a long lasting franchise, which is why it should have never started at all. He's a sickly old man who was going to die. He isn't a monster bound by magic, eternal vengeance,or some kind of spiritual voodoo ties to the real world that makes him eternal. He's dead. And having the villain being replaced by sub par prodigal's is a terrible idea. Anyone remember Friday the 13th part 5?

See,what made Freddy balance out was he was a monster but he still looked and acted human. He had the mannerisms and face of a person, but was a horrible creature at the same time. He was what many horror films have been trying to do these days with downplaying the monsters to make them seem more 'human' and thus more scary. That kind of cripples the character in the long run for giving them a short leash to grow on screen.

IxXnFrm.png


#28 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 06 December 2009 - 08:45 PM

Indeed. Freddy is not an entirely unique character, but rather an interpretation of the old Trickster archetype. Much like some of the darker stories involving Coyote, he may make you laugh, but then he'll eviscerate you while your defenses are down. Or even drop an anvil on you, which is a comedic and horrific situation combined. It's in the trickster's nature to utilize comedy. It has been since advent of such beings and it will be so long as the archetype endures (potentially long after humans are extinct).

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.


#29 John Roberts

John Roberts

    It's a nativity scene, except nobody here is wise

  • Admins
  • 2,589 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Darwin, Australia

Posted 09 December 2009 - 05:21 AM

Saw the trailer today. Freddy was so... bland. mellow.gif
6620

9:06

#30 Guest_KorbenDallas_*

Guest_KorbenDallas_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 18 December 2009 - 10:32 AM



So you don't think this will live up to the older horror remakes like Thing, Fly, Blob, Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1978 or Cat People? or recent good ones like Dawn of the Dead, Ring, King Kong or Hills Have Eyes or even Last House on The Left?

#31 Vlad Yvhv

Vlad Yvhv

    "Non-Intruder Organism"

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 5,512 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas

Posted 18 December 2009 - 07:08 PM

Hell, no... It's going the way of other remakes of good movies: straight down the crapper! Why're you so hung-up on the idea, anyway?

Projection: If Intruder Organsim reaches civilized areas...

Entire world population infected 2,7000 hours from first contact.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users