Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 11:25 AM)

Also I still have to figure out how to set up our e-mail accounts on the new host.

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 08:19 AM)

As soon as I figure out how to restore it. Sorry, I know I said it'd be done by now, but I didn't expect to have to put up with this DNS crap and other issues that popped up.

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

So when's the black theme coming back??

@  Uncle Ben : (24 July 2015 - 07:56 AM)

"Should"

@  furrykef : (24 July 2015 - 07:27 AM)

That DNS took longer to propagate properly than I thought it would. *Now* we should be back for good, though.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:48 PM)

Or it might be because Bluehost *finally* got around to that server wipe (one week after we'd asked for it) and that wiped out our DNS settings. I'm not sure which and I don't really care. In any case, we've severed our last ties with Bluehost, so this will not happen again.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 08:08 PM)

Looks like Bluehost yanked our DNS since our hosting account expired. That's why the site went down a while ago. But as you can see, it's fixed now.

@  Misk : (23 July 2015 - 04:55 PM)

No, they do not.

@  furrykef : (23 July 2015 - 04:27 AM)

The goggles do nothing?

@  Misk : (22 July 2015 - 05:50 PM)

My eyes.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 12:24 PM)

Looks like forum uploads might have been broken since last night. That should be fixed now too.

@  furrykef : (22 July 2015 - 01:33 AM)

Heh, whoops! Server went down for a few mins when I borked the config. Looks like it's back up now.

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 09:09 PM)

It looked like a napkin

@  ILOVEVHS : (21 July 2015 - 09:04 PM)

Fan-fuckin-tastic.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:25 PM)

As for the beaver picture while the forum was down, I think Tim drew it. On a napkin.

@  furrykef : (21 July 2015 - 08:24 PM)

No kiddin' about that "Finally!", Shadow. I am *so mad* at Bluehost for never responding to our support ticket. I submitted it early Friday morning and they *still* haven't answered it!

@  Uncle Ben : (21 July 2015 - 06:37 PM)

Maybe he did that himself

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:25 PM)

Say, who made the cute picture of Beaver Chief?

@  Shadow : (21 July 2015 - 05:24 PM)

Finally!

@  RedMenace : (21 July 2015 - 05:02 PM)

Woooo! The site's back up! Three cheers for Kef!


Ian's criticism discussion on Bumbleking...


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#21 Guest_Miko_*

Guest_Miko_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 01:26 PM

Even if that did happen a lot of rules would have to be in order for a discussion like that. Still I can see making a move in that direction making happy pplz worried about FUS' image.

P.S: fine Viu, I'm coming home! XP

#22 Guest_Viuely_*

Guest_Viuely_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 01:27 PM

Miko its getting dark. Come home already. I'll take it Shorty's with you.

EDIT: BTW I'm walking the dogs in a few so just come right on in.

I'm gonna add more relevant stuff in a sec but I wanted her to see that before she left the board.

Anyway, I don't want this board to suddenly become too obsessed with how people view us just because we're trying to entice traffic. I don't want places like MoFo and Bumbleking to start gaining indirect control here because we'd be trying too hard to make people like us. I don't like a board that places this fake image of peace to please others.

#23 acstrife

acstrife

    THE LAW!

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Delaware, USA

Posted 09 December 2008 - 01:55 PM

QUOTE
Anyway, I don't want this board to suddenly become too obsessed with how people view us just because we're trying to entice traffic.


Honestly, who cares what other people think of FUS? Let them go thier way, and we'll go ours. Simple yeah?

QUOTE
I don't want places like MoFo and Bumbleking to start gaining indirect control here because we'd be trying too hard to make people like us. I don't like a board that places this fake image of peace to please others.


Well I think this is a case of forum being jealous of other forum. I would not put too much worry to it. Besides people who like the our forum will come, and we do have to give FUS site changes a sporting chance to see if it worked. Time will only tell the outcome.
Glory lasts forever

#24 MistressAli

MistressAli

    Pirate Extraordinaire

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 419 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 09 December 2008 - 02:20 PM

QUOTE ("Miko":pt7dwvvf)
QUOTE
It's been like 6 fucking years since the guy's been on the board; maybe the guy has changed. How can you say he might not be behaving in a better manner off the board? Wow, let's just insult people because they like someone you don't! That's not childish or anything!


Just thought I'd quote something straight from the horse's mouth:

QUOTE
And I'm one of the biggest assholes in Sonic fandom.



The way he talks about himself on Chad's thing would suggest otherwise. It doesn't sound like he cares either. Not really my problem though. All I can say is I respect the decisions FUS made with those that were banned. I can't help but feel like people are just commenting out of butthurt.


Yeah, but at least he doesn't deny it unlike Sonmanic who acts like a total innocent
Also, I've been around DA, he doesn't act so bad on there as he did on here sometimes. (And like I said, I personally think there's other people on FUS who acted just as bad. There was a certain mod who I remember regularly cursed out people, called people retards and all sorts of things. I never knew -why- they were a mod, other than that they were pals with Sonique. I can see why people, if they came in during this mod's reign, would be turned off by FUS.)
I think my biggest beef with teh FUS VS Nightweaver/Sonmanic/whoever thing is FUS as a whole acts like everyone should hate them, and if you don't, then you're an 'enemy' of FUS. Kind of like those redneck American people who think just because you don't support a war, that means you're agaisnt the USA or hate the soliders. I personally don't hate Nightweaver/etc, but I see that some people's personal greivances with him have become almost a FUS rule, like we all should have greviances with him.

#25 Guest_Shorty_*

Guest_Shorty_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 02:37 PM

QUOTE
I think my biggest beef with teh FUS VS Nightweaver/Sonmanic/whoever thing is FUS as a whole acts like everyone should hate them


Perhaps for some, but I think for others (like myself), its got more to do with letting people know what these people have done and are capeable of doing. Especially in Sonmanic's case, since he has a tendency to lie and cheat people out of stuff a lot. If a person wants to stick by them after knowing their capeabilities, we can't stop them but if crap hits the fan they can't say they haven't been adequately warned, that no one told them.

...You think someone should make another topic for this? We've been derailing again.


Anyway, what more can I say about the whole Ian thing? I don't really trust him. Heck, I know most board members and even some of our mods don't. What's to protect us if we go there and give our opinions?


#26 Guest_Erinaceus_*

Guest_Erinaceus_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 02:39 PM

Allow me to try to get this back on topic, at least a little...

*Looks at the Bumbleking Forum*...

*Sniff* *Sniff*

...I smell an ego-stroking thread. I don't believe for a second Ian will earnestly heed any potential criticism yielded towards him. As pointed out previously, his more vocal critics just get banned.

I just want one thing answered: What happened to Hope in #176? Where is she?

#27 fishtheimpaler

fishtheimpaler

    Fellow FUSer

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 336 posts

Posted 09 December 2008 - 03:07 PM

Look, go over and talk if you want to. There's more to it than looking good.

Still, though. "Does this script make me look fat?"

#28 Guest_Viuely_*

Guest_Viuely_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 03:14 PM

QUOTE
Honestly, who cares what other people think of FUS? Let them go thier way, and we'll go ours. Simple yeah?


Not quite. If people have a negative opinion they'd be less likely to join. This could be problematic if the new goal for FUS is to entice traffic. However I think what makes FUS different is that we do not try to make a facade of harmony, banning people whose opinions conflict with popular opinion and so on. We can be honest about what we think and I think it makes our community stronger, that we're not so uptight or fearful of what the mods will do because we can usually trust them.

On that note though, I really hate to dredge this but I feel it is the only comparison I can use. I just really don't want another war like with Animator X over trafficing. I would rather not let that sort of weakness in leadership be exploited again. No offense. :/

QUOTE
Look, go over and talk if you want to. There's more to it than looking good.


Yes. But IMO it hardly looks "good", more like banbait. And Ian has done more than his share to have me sold on that.

#29 Guest_Talonfire_*

Guest_Talonfire_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 03:43 PM

That depends really, you'll find that a lot of people lurk on a forum for months (sometimes even years) before joining, myself included. If someone comes here out of curiosity, and sees that it's not as bad as a lot of people say then they may very well join. Let places like this "Bumbleking" think what they want, it's really of little consequence in the long run. It's not worth getting worked up over some users and other forum communities insulting yours, you're not going to win everyone after all.

Now as for this Ian character, a good writer appreciates constructive criticism. I haven't seen the criticism shot at this guy, so I can't really form an opinion on the matter. If he isn't open to constructive criticism, though; he's not a very good writer. Critics are your friends, you can't fix your flaws if you don't know what they are, and a "normal" person would strive to fix their flaws. On the other hand, if these more "vocal" folks are being banned for simply insulting the man, and offering nothing that is actually constructive, then that is simply flaming and hate mongering. I wouldn't blame Ian if that is the case.

I won't be signing up on this forum since I don't read comics, but that's my two cents on the matter.

#30 Valerie Valens

Valerie Valens

    Ein Fahrender Ritter

  • F3 Staff
  • 768 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:HK, China

Posted 09 December 2008 - 05:39 PM

QUOTE ("MistressAli":22ymiyet)
How laughable. There's been people on this board who act just as bad, or as rude as Nightweaver ever did. Hell, some of those assholes used to be -mods-, for cripe's sakes. And when we even have the former owner of these site trying to hack it, how can we judge other people if they think 'Nightweaver isn't that bad.' It's been like 6 fucking years since the guy's been on the board; maybe the guy has changed. How can you say he might not be behaving in a better manner off the board? Wow, let's just insult people because they like someone you don't! That's not childish or anything!

QUOTE
I'm just saying maybe we have too many occurrences of posts of this nature where someone who seems opposed to FUS or gets on the wrong side of the board gets publicly bashed or criticised.


I agree, it makes this place seems so elitist. For members who 'hurt' the board and have now been gone for years and years, why not just get the hell over it?

Wow, it makes me sad that so many people I like or respect, some who have visited FUS for years, have been driven away by this very attitude.


I guess you were gleefully oblivious to the fact that Daniel "Nightweaver" Harris tried to forcefully solicit cyber sex from Morgan, who was a minor at the time. I don't think a mere 6 years is enough to make us forget this kind of shit. It could also be argued that he did more damage to the image of FUS than anyone else, especially with that PoE incident where he fantasized that sticking it in a ferret's pooper is an experience better than nirvana.

If he was just a garden variety douchebag, then I might agree with your position, but I know better.

Also, the reasons those regulars have left have nothing to do with what you mentioned, the reasons are multi-faceted. So let's not go down that strawman line of reasoning, okay?

PS : Sonicus Prime is one of the best Mods/Admins FUS has ever had. Don't knock him just because he doesn't carry a facade of niceness and cannot tolerate bullshit.

76561197990969478.png


#31

  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 06:00 PM

Well I think whether or not he's sincere it's worth the chance to actually submit feedback towards the comics.

#32 MistressAli

MistressAli

    Pirate Extraordinaire

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 419 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 09 December 2008 - 06:23 PM

Oh no, cybersex? How horrible!
If it was real sex, I might care. As it is, I guess I could get arrested for making dirty jokes online if a minor was present.

Besides, I'm more irked at the fact that FUS as a whole will shun people just because they might be friends or even mere aquaintances with 'enemies of the FUS'. I'm not saying to let the 'enemies' back in, but what's the point of keeping this blacklist and making FUS look hostile? What's the point when those people aren't on FUS anymore?

QUOTE
It could also be argued that he did more damage to the image of FUS than anyone else, especially with that PoE incident.

Most people complaining seemed to have an issue with mods being mean to newbies, or the atmosphere seeming too elitist... and I noticed a bunch of them are affiliating FUS with writing ED articles. Hmmm?

QUOTE
PS : Sonicus Prime is one of the best Mods/Admins FUS has ever had. Don't knock him just because he doesn't carry a facade of niceness and cannot tolerate bullshit.


Wow, I don't remember mentioning names, Val.

#33 chief

chief

    An7imatt3r was here =p

  • Admins
  • 6,487 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Coast, BC, Canada

Posted 09 December 2008 - 06:29 PM

Ughhhh! Ok last thing we need is some stupid internal war on us being elistist or whatever..,


Ok I know I made this thing go off topic cause I hate how FUS got summed into a single group but honestly everyone... If FUS is going to start getting rid of its bad rep with some people (besides idiots who deserve to be banned) We can't be fighting with each other on who or how or who did what blahhh...


So yes... Put this thing back on topic or I'm locking it... We don't need some internal war here.

#34 Anaesthesia

Anaesthesia

    Nazi penguin suits.

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Coney Island Disco Palace

Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:08 PM

I have nothing to contribute to the main topic, but I do want to say one thing:

QUOTE ("MistressAli":17id6ktz)
Oh no, cybersex? How horrible!
If it was real sex, I might care. As it is, I guess I could get arrested for making dirty jokes online if a minor was present.

Cracking a dirty joke isn't the same as making an actual advance. If the jerk was trying to cyber with someone who wasn't interested, especially someone who was clearly a minor, it was still an unwanted advance. Online or IRL, sexual harassment is sexual harassment.
I figured I had paid my debt to society
By paying my overdue fines
At the Multnoma County Library

#35 Ratty Randnums

Ratty Randnums

    He of Little Sleep

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 1,385 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Milky Way

Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:34 PM

QUOTE ("MistressAli":2gltpn8t)
There was a certain mod who I remember regularly cursed out people, called people retards and all sorts of things.

QUOTE
PS : Sonicus Prime is one of the best Mods/Admins FUS has ever had. Don't knock him just because he doesn't carry a facade of niceness and cannot tolerate bullshit.


Wow, I don't remember mentioning names, Val.

Yes, you come off, oh, very much as if you don't have the nerve to say things like they are.

QUOTE ("Anaesthesia":2gltpn8t)
I have nothing to contribute to the main topic, but I do want to say one thing:

QUOTE ("MistressAli":2gltpn8t)
Oh no, cybersex? How horrible!
If it was real sex, I might care. As it is, I guess I could get arrested for making dirty jokes online if a minor was present.

Cracking a dirty joke isn't the same as making an actual advance. If the jerk was trying to cyber with someone who wasn't interested, especially someone who was clearly a minor, it was still an unwanted advance. Online or IRL, sexual harassment is sexual harassment.

Yes, he threatend to ban Morgan when she started to refuse, so Morgan then showed the logs to Alison (who was living with/dating him at the time) and they broke up, shortly after triggering Nightweavers hack attack in which he deleted FUS because Alison had given him all her passwords and not changed them.



PS- I agree Prime was an awesome mod/admin, he turned not sugar coating things into an art form. But I never saw him be more harsh than the person he was talking to deserved.
"I really think of life as a great expression of joy. And if you take yourself seriously you're going to be defeated I'm afraid.
...Maybe that is the whole recipe of life, is to be in on the joke. Because life is a joke and if you're not in on it you're out.
But if you're in on it, you can make it." - Vincent Price

"What have you got to lose? You know you come from nothing you're going back to nothing. What have you lost? Nothing!"
- Eric Idle

#36 Guest_Miko_*

Guest_Miko_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:44 PM

Back on topic if too many FUSers go there and get banned for voicing criticisms it may not be good for FUS' image. Although, on that same token I'm with the lot that says screw the "image". When this board becomes so image conscious that it's pretentious and bans folks who have differing opinions we would arguably be rather intolerant and close minded (irony no?). Yeah people like myself can voice disagreements a lot but no one's forcing others to agree at this point. But a noose around your neck that says "agree or face the banhammer"? That's intolerance and that's forcing you to agree. There's a difference.

#37 Valerie Valens

Valerie Valens

    Ein Fahrender Ritter

  • F3 Staff
  • 768 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:HK, China

Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:57 PM

QUOTE ("chief":e3r513fl)
Ok I know I made this thing go off topic cause I hate how FUS got summed into a single group but honestly everyone... If FUS is going to start getting rid of its bad rep with some people (besides idiots who deserve to be banned) We can't be fighting with each other on who or how or who did what blahhh...

To add to this, I would also like to mention that unfounded accusations like this :
QUOTE ("MistressAli":e3r513fl)
Besides, I'm more irked at the fact that FUS as a whole will shun people just because they might be friends or even mere aquaintances with 'enemies of the FUS'. I'm not saying to let the 'enemies' back in, but what's the point of keeping this blacklist and making FUS look hostile? What's the point when those people aren't on FUS anymore?

Is also not needed.

76561197990969478.png


#38 MistressAli

MistressAli

    Pirate Extraordinaire

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 419 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 09 December 2008 - 08:18 PM

QUOTE
Yes, you come off, oh, very much as if you don't have the nerve to say things like they are.


Oh please, I have the nerve, I just don't like to drag names into things. I figure if people know who I'm talking about, then fine.

QUOTE
Yes, he threatend to ban Morgan when she started to refuse, so Morgan then showed the logs to Alison (who was living with/dating him at the time) and they broke up, shortly after triggering Nightweavers hack attack in which he deleted FUS because Alison had given him all her passwords and not changed them


Thanks for shedding more light on this, I will take back what I said about the cybersex. (I never thought it was right, btw, but I didn't think it was that big a deal.)

QUOTE
To add to this, I would also like to mention that unfounded accusations like this :Is also not needed.


The whole reason I even jumped into this discussion was because Viuely made a post naming names of people who were supposedly 'not wanted' at FUS because of this or that, one reason being that they thought Nightweaver 'wasn't that bad'. (whatever their reasons for thinking so...) So really, how is this unfounded when it happened right in this topic?

#39 Guest_Miko_*

Guest_Miko_*
  • GUESTS

Posted 09 December 2008 - 08:24 PM

I think Viuely was a little ticked off Ali, because Nightweaver's a self proclaimed asshole and they're fine with him, but there's a double standard placed on board members here. We're jerks to some folks and that's bad, he's a jerk and that's fine. Wait what? It's not a matter of hate his friends because FUS hates him. She didn't think they were judging us fairly.

#40 MistressAli

MistressAli

    Pirate Extraordinaire

  • Fellow FUSer
  • 419 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 09 December 2008 - 09:10 PM

Alright, I get that now. (I still don't think it's right to name names.)
But someone proclaiming to be an asshole is one thing, and acting like one is another, and I've seen Night around DA and he dosen't really act like a jerk (from what I've seen.). So none of the people mentioned by Viuely KNOW what Night did here, they only know what they see around DA, which is probably some nice comments on somebody's art, or whatever. I mean, does anyone get what I'm saying here? So, these people come to FUS and see people still harping on what they consider to be 'some mistake in the past' and they think this place is hostile and holding grudges.
OR they otherwise encountered some sort of unwelcoming atmosphere here which made them turn around and leave. No, it's not right for them to judge everyone here by some people's behavior. I guess it's all about first impressions.
Anyway, I HOPE this clarifies what I originally meant to say, because obviously I get misread so friggin' often on this board. *rolls eyes*




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users